It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TRIPOLI (AFP) – Italy on Wednesday called for an immediate halt to hostilities in Libya to allow humanitarian aid to reach the population in the strife-torn country, while NATO defended the credibility of its air war after a bomb misfired killing civilians.
Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini warned on Tuesday that NATO's credibility was "at risk" following the civilian casualties, and urged it to ensure it was not providing ammunition to Kadhafi's propaganda war.
Germany's Defense Minister Thomas de Maziere has criticized NATO's controversial military operation in Libya and lack of foresight when it comes to intervening in the North African country.
Speaking this month in Brussels, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned our European allies in NATO that freeloading on America's outsized military might cannot guarantee their security forever. Or even in the near term, which Gates said could soon turn "dismal" for the alliance.
Gates did cite Norway, Denmark, Belgium and Canada for "punch(ing) well above their weight" fighting in Libya, but then turned that praise into his most damning critique overall.
"The mightiest military alliance in history," Gates said, "is only 11 weeks into an operation against a poorly armed regime in a sparsely populated country — yet many allies are beginning to run short of munitions, requiring the U.S., once more, to make up the difference."
One reason European states must "be responsible for their fair share of the common defense," he said, was due to the squeezed budgets and shifting priorities in the U.S. Future American taxpayers, he said, simply will not see NATO as "worth the cost."
Few European states are likely to quake at that threat. Last year, the U.S. paid about $712 million, more than one-fifth the cost of keeping NATO afloat. In addition, we have been raising military spending, now more than $700 billion a year, with few signs of reversal for more than a decade. Every dollar spent offers collateral protection to our allies.
Originally posted by beezzer
I get a kick out of people saying, "It's not a U.S. operation in Libya, it's NATO."
WE ARE NATO!!!
We fund, we arm, we manage, we supply, we dictate.
We are NATO. The other countries are along for the cash and bennies that come from going along with U.S. foreign policy.
NATO will never fall apart because "we" will never fall apart.
Just my humble opinion. Nice thread.
Originally posted by theRhenn
As bad a shape as we are in... If the US pulled out of NATO, the United Nations, and any other groups that we sponcer.. fund.. There would be none.
We spend majority of the funds that go into these factions. If we stopped, they would go broke instantly.
If we stopped giving aid to countries, they would fall apart.
If we stopped sending food and medical supplies, they would starve and die.
I hate to sound like we're the Big G Suppliers of the world.. but we are.
If we stop.. everyone goes to hell in a handbasket, wars would break out far worse than now, countries would riot and kill one another, cannibalism would be common....
soooo... Why dont we?
Ever hear of welfare states? We dont just extend welfare benefits to the poor and in most cases, lazy.. but we do it for every blasted country in the world... and they too just seem lazy. They rather hold their hand out than to get on the ball themselves. Sure, disaster aid is a wonderful thing. Keep your brothers and sisters alive.. but.. Teach a man to fish!!!edit on 23-6-2011 by theRhenn because: added
Originally posted by Vanishr
reply to post by beezzer
What an ignorant and wrong Opinion, the other countries are apart of NATO, as they have no choice, see what happens when and if any countries leave, they will become the next 'libya' uprising followed by endless pointless bombing.
But... At the same time, if we stopped pushing our hard earned tax dollars out the door, many third world countries would fall apart and fall even more into chaos than what they are now.
We are NATO. The other countries are along for the cash and bennies that come from going along with U.S. foreign policy.
Originally posted by theRhenn
As bad a shape as we are in... If the US pulled out of NATO, the United Nations, and any other groups that we sponcer.. fund.. There would be none.
We spend majority of the funds that go into these factions. If we stopped, they would go broke instantly.
If we stopped giving aid to countries, they would fall apart.
If we stopped sending food and medical supplies, they would starve and die.
I hate to sound like we're the Big G Suppliers of the world.. but we are.
If we stop.. everyone goes to hell in a handbasket, wars would break out far worse than now, countries would riot and kill one another, cannibalism would be common....
soooo... Why dont we?
Ever hear of welfare states? We dont just extend welfare benefits to the poor and in most cases, lazy.. but we do it for every blasted country in the world... and they too just seem lazy. They rather hold their hand out than to get on the ball themselves. Sure, disaster aid is a wonderful thing. Keep your brothers and sisters alive.. but.. Teach a man to fish!!!edit on 23-6-2011 by theRhenn because: added
.
Originally posted by buni11687
Italy urges end to Libya conflict
TRIPOLI (AFP) – Italy on Wednesday called for an immediate halt to hostilities in Libya to allow humanitarian aid to reach the population in the strife-torn country, while NATO defended the credibility of its air war after a bomb misfired killing civilians.
Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini warned on Tuesday that NATO's credibility was "at risk" following the civilian casualties, and urged it to ensure it was not providing ammunition to Kadhafi's propaganda war.
It looks like Italy is getting pretty upset about the actions in Libya.
Then there's Germany, which has expressed criticism towards NATO.
Germany slams NATO mission in Libya
Germany's Defense Minister Thomas de Maziere has criticized NATO's controversial military operation in Libya and lack of foresight when it comes to intervening in the North African country.
I did some searching and found this article.
Column: Why the U.S. is stuck with NATO's bill
Speaking this month in Brussels, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned our European allies in NATO that freeloading on America's outsized military might cannot guarantee their security forever. Or even in the near term, which Gates said could soon turn "dismal" for the alliance.
Gates did cite Norway, Denmark, Belgium and Canada for "punch(ing) well above their weight" fighting in Libya, but then turned that praise into his most damning critique overall.
"The mightiest military alliance in history," Gates said, "is only 11 weeks into an operation against a poorly armed regime in a sparsely populated country — yet many allies are beginning to run short of munitions, requiring the U.S., once more, to make up the difference."
So if this article is correct, the US is the one supplying the arms to our allies.....because they already ran out??......and they dont have the money to make more????
One reason European states must "be responsible for their fair share of the common defense," he said, was due to the squeezed budgets and shifting priorities in the U.S. Future American taxpayers, he said, simply will not see NATO as "worth the cost."
Well.....good. There is alot more important things to worry about other than funding NATO (cough cough *jobs* cough cough)
Few European states are likely to quake at that threat. Last year, the U.S. paid about $712 million, more than one-fifth the cost of keeping NATO afloat. In addition, we have been raising military spending, now more than $700 billion a year, with few signs of reversal for more than a decade. Every dollar spent offers collateral protection to our allies.
So the European states dont want to pay for NATO....so what? Let them deal with their own problems.
At the same time, how about the US dosent pay for NATO either? How about we deal with our own problems at home first? (I doubt that will happen anytime soon)