Pro Global Warming Scientists at it again.

You would think they would have learned the first time. Manipulate, distort, and delete data.....get caught.....then all you have done is debunk everything you are trying to prove in the first place. Effectively branding it a HOAX.

www.foxnews.com...

Is climate change raising sea levels, as Al Gore has argued -- or are climate scientists doctoring the data?
The University of Colorado’s Sea Level Research Group decided in May to add 0.3 millimeters -- or about the thickness of a fingernail -- every year to its actual measurements of sea levels, sparking criticism from experts who called it an attempt to exaggerate the effects of global warming.

"When Al Gore talks about Manhattan flooding this century, and 20 feet of sea level rise, that’s simply not going to happen. If it were going to happen, he wouldn’t have bought his multi-million dollar mansion along the coast in California."

Originally posted by Carseller4
You would think they would have learned the first time. Manipulate, distort, and delete data.....get caught.....then all you have done is debunk everything you are trying to prove in the first place. Effectively branding it a HOAX.

This statement is typical of the anti warming conspiracists who have not even bothered to read what all the "manipulation" was about. The devil is in the detail as they say.

Investigate where the stories come from READ EVERY EMAIL, cross reference each mistake and then come to a conclusion that has not been lifted , ad-nauseum, from regurgitated propaganda.

oh wait but, but

...

follow the F¨*#% money, thats all I gotta say

global institution to control all carbon trades

reply to post by Carseller4


All I can say is....

reply to post by malcr

This statement is typical of the anti warming conspiracists who have not even bothered to read what all the "manipulation" was about. The devil is in the detail as they say.

Then "typical" must be an acknowledgement that they are true; and that exaggeration, cherry-picking and outright data manipulation to make the "models" fit their agenda are par for the AGW "science."

The "details" always seem to be correct:

No loss of Arctic polar ice cap by 1998, 2000 or 2008
No lost Himalayan glaicers by 2035
NYC not underwater by 2000, 2010, or 2020
Adding to predicted sea level rise and rate of rise
Denying the reality of the MWP
and the lust hust goes on and on.

jw