It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If it was at least 60 degrees above the horizon, then it wasn't an atmospheric reflection. But if you're misremembering the elevation, it could indeed disappear. Let's say the star's actual position is behind the mountaintop, then when the star's reflected image disappears, you may not see the original image of the star since it's behind the mountaintop.
Originally posted by Dr Expired
Thanks for the detailed and interesting reply, I can see how the atmosphere could play a part , sort of put the star out of focus like a telescope can, but just one problem, the sun was stil there , this star dissappeared , and it was at least 60 degrees above the mountainous horizon.
Yes it may have been posted before perhaps.
Originally posted by Dr Conspire
Ok I cannot remember if I have posted this subject or not
Well, you can keep posting this once a year I suppose, but I doubt you're going to get any answers you haven't already gotten. There's nothing in actuality that will do exactly what you say, but there are some natural things which could have been misperceived and/or misremembered that would be close and people have offered some explanations for those, defcon5's answer last year was pretty good I thought. A bolide can cross the path of a star and it could create the illusion that it was the star that fell, but yes the star would still be there. That doesn't mean our brains would always recognize that fact, especially if we saw it disappear, when we looked back up we might think it's something else. We try to make sense out of what we see but the result of that process doesn't always end up being a correct perception, even in real-time.
Originally posted by Dr Expired
My memory is getting worse so I apologise if I have asked this question before