Prove to me that 1. World Trade Building 7 Was not brought down by charges and 2. Or that you could place enough explosives in a building that has
47 floors in less than 6 hours to bring it down in on itself all while having to enter a building that has fires on two floors.
Either way, you have contradiction. I want to see what you guys can think up
This has been talked about before on ATS. I don't think anyone can add anymore.
Having said that I do wonder if WTC7 might have been designed in the first place to be blown.
If it was designed to be blown then you could design it so you only need a small amount of explosive placed on key structual areas. Or even have them
The same could be said for the twin towers.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.