It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bossnoo1
I am interested in debunking the woman who wrote "The Pleiadian Agenda", among other books.
I have reviewed her website and it seems that she is nothing more than a Pastor Bob Larson version of New Age Philosophy, which subsequently, is not real.
In fact, her products, workshops, and prices are very similar to other fakes who use impressionable people for money.
Now, the argument is made that she may very well be telling the truth. Really, then why does she use such an evasive, general language to sell cheap products. Why did she take her ideas from a Billy Meier (who made UFO's from pie tins and photographed them?)
Why doesn't she profess ideas and technology that no one can yet comprehend. Because it seems that all these supposed UFOologists can only speak to us on current or near-future terms and that's regading technology.
Recycling other human being's knowledge or taking their words will not impress anyone but inspire the have not's to buy a DVD for $30.
Televisions are some of the worst technology to use Barbara if you think anyone wants to pretend they are metaphysical. So, is the internet.
Televisions fry heads and brainwash.
edit on 12-6-2011 by bossnoo1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Tayesin
It's all well and good to have your own opinions. It's even good to share them here.
But, it isn't okay to desire to take someone down just because you disagree with them. So one must then ask what is the motivation behind that desire?
You make some specifically negative value-based comments about the validity of her work and the experiences others have. So one would have to ask what your experience is and whether it has provided you any clearer perception on reality than any other person... that you can demonstrate the effectiveness of. If the answer there is doubtful, then find something else you can positively effect in your life.
edit on 12-6-2011 by Tayesin because: dyslexia
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
Would you be making the same argument that it's not OK to make "negative value-based comments about the validity of someones work" if he was talking about a Cult Group like Heaven's Gate? Sometimes it's necessary to make "negative value-based comments about the validity of [someone's] work"....that's what debate is all about...that's what these boards are all about. I WANT people to debate my own work...If I never consider other's may view a specific subject differently than I do, then I will never grow in my own understanding...the only people who don't welcome such debate are those that know that their own work can not stand up to logical debate....in other words people who have something to hide....whether they are hiding some sort of agenda, or simply are themselves wishing to hide their head in a self made hole of delusions and ignorance.