posted on Aug, 10 2004 @ 07:23 AM
I checked out the site.
He is really reaching in his theories and the pictures that he promotes as "evidence" are distorted and highly inconclusive.
He has about as much evidence to support his theory that the government used a military plane to crash into the twin towers as David Icke has that
world leaders are actually shape-shifting Reptilians!
UFO pictures that have that degree of distortion are usually dismissed by Ufologists. I see no reason why these blurry pictures should not also be
Provide us with a governmental insider that knew of the purported plan to orchestrate 9/11 in order to further the New World Order, start a new
thread, and have him discuss it with us.
People like Bob Lazar and (Ret.) US Army Sgt. Clifford Stone were governmental insiders who went public about their awareness on UFOs and aliens. They
constitute credible sources.
Richard Tomlinson, the former MI5/MI6 agent who went public about his awareness that Princess Diana was assassinated, constitutes a credible
But I have yet to see or hear about a governmental insider to come out publicly to declare his or her understanding of the Bush administration's
staging of 9/11. If it were such a monumental operation by the government, then why hasn't an insider come out publicly to talk about it?
Answer: because it is a bogus theory and pure propaganda that is being promoted by those on the far left and anarchists who desire more political
[edit on 10-8-2004 by Paul_Richard]