NATO Massacre 718 in Libya, page 1

The Libyan regime in a press conference stated that over 718 innocent civilians have been the victim of the "NATO humanitarian bombings". Over 4000 injured, and over 430 of them in critical condition.

Considering that over 2000 bombs/strikes (lowest estimation) have been dropped in Libya, the casualty reported by the Libyan regime shouldn't be under estimated.

The Libyan regime said that "these figures do not include Libyan military casualties, a toll the defence ministry refuses to divulge." (Source)

Civilian casualties under NATO humanitarian bombings has increased because NATO has surpassed its obligations. It is not involved in an operation to protect civilians anymore, rather it is involved in a war, supporting the rebels through (air, sea and special ops attacks), financing and organizing them through military advisers. Helicopters are being sent to Libya as we speak, to help the rebels.

The above paragraph shows that the operation has changed from saving civilian lives, to toppling a regime. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton "it is time for him to go", referring to Qaddafi.

Who does Clinton propose should replace the revolutionary regime of Libya?

Senator McCain gives us a hint when he said "Washington should recognize the rebels' Transitional National Council as the official government of Libya", France has already recognized the rebels as the official Libyan government.

Who are these rebels?


The Rebels have existed long before the uprisings in Libya, the same Rebels tried to topple the revolutionary government of Libyan before, but failed.

The Rebels were priorly known as LNA (Libyan National Army), it is believe that this group was financed and organized by CIA for over 2 decades, since the first failed attempt, till now. (Source - UNHCR)

The rebels just recently changed their armed wing's name (previously known as LNA), now named NLA (National Liberation Army).

Simply put, NATO wants a regime change to replace it with its own pawn (the rebels).

reply to post by confreak

---

I have no opinion on Gadaffi at all. I do not know the man or his methods.
What I find bizarre is that a few people rebel against a particular ruler or system and the rest of the world join in and kill even more people in that country.
If 'some' people were dissatisfied with the government in the UK, as they probably are for the majority of the time, would we expect NATO to come and bomb the living daylights out of everyone.
None of this makes sense. Of course an existing government is going to 'fight back'.
What is the West doing in Libya except doing what they claim Gadaffi said he was going to do, kill people.

I suspect the world has gone mad, and in particular its political leaders and hence I wish to claim no part in this nonsense and leave the end of this matter to Karma!


Do NOT play the game people, Do not participate and leave the end result to ultimate justice.
The world will witness many more world leaders in the Hague War Crimes cells in the near future as they are sailed down the river by their masters. It is the way.

UPDATE

"NATO extends operation in Libya another 90 days"

Source

reply to post by MainLineThis

---

Some would argue those fools were CIA pawns in the first place, so that doesn't mean Libyans asked for air support, rather CIA pawns asked for air support.

UPDATE

"Libya conflict UN accuses both sides of war crimes "
Source

Turn of events. No option left in Libya but to get out, the Congress tried to push for a vote, the anti-war movement is growing, "Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) said he will push for a vote on a bill calling for President Obama to withdraw forces from the Libya operation."

"“We are in control in the House, and we want something on the floor,” said Rep. John Campbell (R-Calif.), one of a number of conservatives who called Wednesday for a showdown with Obama. “Put a resolution up, and let us express . . . to the president that ‘you no longer have the authority of this Congress to conduct military operations in that country.’""
Source

Found an interesting article on how Libya invested a billion bucks into Goldman Sachs and GS lost it, then negotiations fell apart between GS and Gaddafi (early 2000s). I'm not really into economics or banking crap, but it seems important

How Goldman Sachs Made Libya's $1 Billion Investment Disappear

Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Found an interesting article on how Libya invested a billion bucks into Goldman Sachs and GS lost it, then negotiations fell apart between GS and Gaddafi (early 2000s). I'm not really into economics or banking crap, but it seems important

How Goldman Sachs Made Libya's $1 Billion Investment Disappear

Not to mention Ghaddafi was trying to set up a gold backed Dinar and invited all African countries and some Arab ones to join. You can't tell me that wouldn't of been bad news for the Dollar.

Israel and the Upcoming Nuclear War - The "Unthinkable" is Now Inevitable
  Posted 11 days ago with 28 member flags

Ahmadinejad speaking at the UN - Is he going to declare war?
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags

Turkey says it is prepared for possibility of war with Israel
  Posted 10 days ago with 15 member flags

IDF general: Likelihood of regional war growing
  Posted 18 days ago with 14 member flags

Full-scale Middle East war is \'imminent\', warns Israeli general
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags

I can see a scenario taking place which is fulfulling biblical prophecy.
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags

Netanyahu: Palestinian Statehood Bid \'Doomed\'
  Posted 4 days ago with 9 member flags

US Boots on the Ground in Libya, Pentagon Confirms
  Posted 11 days ago with 8 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: