It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Badgered1
Quick, call Colin Powell back to the UN to explain it. I'm sure he'd do a bang up job of explaining everything. Never let the facts stand in the way of a good story, eh?
Although I do understand the implications of Iran having a nuclear arsenal, I don't think we (i.e. any other nation) has the right to say they can or can't have them. If they told the US that they shouldn't have nukes the US would laugh at them. Similarly, they laugh at the US. I think that's fair. As it stands, I think we (the west) are not protecting our people when we take issue, but protecting the assets of the few.
Fox leading the bugle call? Pah.
Originally posted by dirtycrickrat
Has the whole "wipe Israel off of the map" thing been long proven that it was a misinterpretation of him actually saying "erase the lines off of the map and return to Palestinian territory''?
this article is bs.
Originally posted by Britguy
Note the use of the term "Nuclear Capable" here.
Also, reports from last October revealed that the Obama administration concluded that Chinese firms were helping Iran with the improvement of its missile technology and the development of nuclear weapons, and asked China to stop such activity.
Originally posted by Itop1
"Dont let them have nukes because nukes are dangerous" - Rich comming from the only country that has ever used TWO of them to kill thousands and still holds a huge stockpile now, and the argument " america dont want other countries to have them because they know what nukes can do" is flawed because if they were that bad then the US would have got rid of their stockpile also....