It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New DNA data suggests this is an ALIEN SKULL !!

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 03:27 PM
link   
As of March 2010 the Starchild Skull has had new and more elaborate DNA tests which appear to prove that it is a hybrid (human-unknown)..

Recent science has made analysis of DNA from ancient bone fragments a possibility and the initial results for this highly unusual skull have forced that third possibility -- that it is extraterrestrial --

The Starchild skull was found 80 years ago in a remote cave in Mexico..


here is th elinks to a full article and interesting pics.......

www.viewzone.com...

www.viewzone.com...

www.viewzone.com...




posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 03:34 PM
link   
reply to post by romka71
 


good find Now let's find one like this one ...alive !



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 03:39 PM
link   
everyone of us,not just some starchild,has alien DNA but "they" arent going to tell us that..were nothing more than an alien experiament that seems to be going way wrong and thats why theyll be back soon enough to fix their mistake...were all like ants in an antfarm to them...but the aliens didnt just find us and lock us in, they added their own genes to our ancestors to become who we are today..so to me this doesnt seem to far fetched...



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 03:55 PM
link   
Clone it.



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 04:06 PM
link   
Dna testing on this skull indicated it had both a human mother and father.

DNA testing DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD, a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes". Further DNA testing at Trace Genetics, which specializes in extracting DNA from ancient samples, in 2003 recovered mitochondrial DNA from both skulls. The child belongs to haplogroup C. Since mitochondrial DNA is inherited exclusively from the mother, it makes it possible to trace the offspring's maternal lineage. The DNA test therefore confirmed that the child's mother was a Haplogroup C human female. However, the adult female found with the child belonged to haplogroup A. Both haplotypes are characteristic Native American haplogroups, but the different haplogroup for each skull indicates that the adult female was not the child's mother.[8] [edit]

If the skull was that of a native american child with human parents how can it be a hybrid? It could have been altered genetically after birth but why wouldn't any government agency take it?The starchild website has always asked for donations to "further research" only to claim the proof is just around the corner.I can't help but wonder why a singular entity from the private sector wouldn't fund the research.Seems like people had a good reason to stay away from Loyd and his skull for whatever it may be.



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 04:09 PM
link   
we dont have any alien dna, so how can we link human-??? to alien?

please explain yourself

if it looks humanoid and it was found on earth... using logic, we can conclude that it's not alien.



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 04:19 PM
link   
The giant skeleton being 'unearthed' pic/s from that site are a known hoax. As it was a digitally enlarged normal sized skeleton, not the shovel has no bottom half. Not to say the alien proof your presenting is as well, but it leeds to that suspicion. Though, the skulls in question look to be hydrocephalus or shaped.
edit on 30-4-2011 by dreamingawake because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 04:49 PM
link   
to dreamingawake

no...not a fake..

it was on tv..real



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 04:58 PM
link   
what bothers me is that if this is such conclusive evidence why isnt this all over the msm, or maybe its not so conclusive.



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by romka71
to dreamingawake

no...not a fake..

it was on tv..real




I know the starchild skull is real but just because something was on TV it doesn't necessarily mean it's real.



new topics

top topics



 
5

log in

join