The Final Warning to Tokyo

reply to post by TrueAmerican


This is the list of quakes in the Tokyo area since this began on the 9th March

Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2011-04-21 13:54:01, 35.602, 140.530, 4.7, 52.9, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-21 13:47:12, 35.762, 140.703, 4.9, 46.1, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-21 13:47:11, 35.300, 140.640, 4.7, 68.0, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu Japan
2011-04-21 13:37:03, 35.616, 140.452, 6.1, 42.9, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-17 18:08:49, 35.800, 140.050, 4.7, 72.0, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu Japan
2011-04-17 18:08:46, 35.705, 140.022, 4.7, 46.5, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-17 06:49:23, 35.783, 140.321, 4.6, 28.3, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-17 04:39:01, 35.860, 140.335, 4.5, 34.2, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-12 23:36:22, 35.450, 140.730, 5.2, 22.0, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu Japan
2011-04-11 23:08:16, 35.406, 140.542, 6.2, 13.1, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-09 21:23:05, 35.667, 140.045, 4.9, 64.6, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-04-07 10:52:13, 35.607, 140.488, 4.7, 35.5, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-03-17 15:51:55, 35.993, 140.747, 4.7, 34.0, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-03-17 12:32:02, 35.522, 140.744, 5.6, 21.0, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-03-16 13:39:05, 35.822, 140.285, 5.4, 88.2, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-03-15 10:31:28, 35.798, 140.646, 4.8, 42.2, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-03-13 17:29:11, 35.682, 140.667, 4.8, 29.8, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-03-12 14:14:55, 35.767, 140.559, 4.9, 24.7, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan
2011-03-11 19:24:28, 35.769, 140.638, 5.5, 24.9, Nr. N. Coast Of Honshu. Japan

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f3c361360076.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by TrueAmerican


hope you are not accusing me as I was the fourth and eighth post trying to find out how genuine you where in the belief in your own theory.
It is easy for someone to come up with a theory for anything, what is hard is to stand by your own belief when questioned by others, If you are so sure, the neigh sayers should hold no power over your stance or belief, If however you doubt your own theory it may be time to re evaluate it.

If I had worked out a theory which I believed was correct, I would be shouting from the rooftops to make sure that those in danger would hear the message.

So my question to you is "how strong do you believe in your own theory?
and what are you going to do about getting the message out as 99% of those people that may be effected will have no idea what ATS is

Originally posted by triscuits123
reply to post by AnnonymousLurker

 

Hahaha wait... You have 51 posts but you say your a true ATSer? How does that happen?

No need to register or post to be on ATS. You don`t know how long I`ve been on this forum, just how many posts I`ve made since I recently registered.
Also, the amount of posts a person has made bears no relevance to the validity of their opinion.

This thread is sensationalist, and when nothing drastic happens within the specified timeframe the scepticism shown by common sense responders to the OP will be vindicated. Although by then no doubt there will be a whole bunch of other hysterical threads on other subjects that will have overtaken.

reply to post by PuterMan


Ahh no, that is just a partial list. With your smarts I don't understand how you just completely omit the JMA's records from your list. :shk:

There are many, many more smaller quakes you are not showing.

reply to post by TrueAmerican


Basically TA because the JMA do not have a suitable web page for collecting data automatically as much of the information is spread across more than one page which makes automatic collection impossible.

Despite two emails to them to see it they have another source of data I have heard nothing. I just don't have time to troll around several; pages to get a few details for the smaller quakes.

Perhaps you would like to post the smaller ones, with all the relevant data - time in UTC, lat, lon, depth, mag, mag type, number of stations as a minimum?

It takes me all my time to keep up with the 4.5 ones and I get those automatically. They still have to be loaded into the database and then output to my wordpress blog(s) and KMZ files created, graphs created daily (I don't always have time for daily). All the data is then added to the world wide analysis and that is updated. It actually, when all areas are taken into account, takes many hours a day. On top of that since I collect USGS and EMSC data, sometimes the automated systemn I devised can't determine if a quake is the same on each list so that is flagged and I have to look at those as well. That alone can run to some time all around the world each day especially on a busy day. Then people want sound files!!!!!

That is a mite different from just looking at them.

reply to post by PuterMan


Well I realize all that. But you can't just post the quakes like you did to illustrate a point without stating that the information is incomplete. Because it is. The fact that it is difficult to collect doesn't change the point. I happened to luck out on my first attempt at contact with them, and they did provide me with additional info. Since then however, I have not received a single response to any of my mail, including the link to this thread which I sent them.

They don't have time for speculators and information seekers, and given their situation, I can't say I blame them.

And btw, I expect you to shout from all rooftops worldwide every single theory, thread, website, and thought that you ever have in the future, or else you will be accused of attention seeking. Great, just thought we'd get that straight.

Originally posted by TrueAmerican
reply to post by PuterMan

 

Well I realize all that. But you can't just post the quakes like you did to illustrate a point without stating that the information is incomplete.

It was not illustrating any point at all TA simple showing what was going on in the Tokyo area. Note I did not comment on it or make any assertions. Purely for people to be informed. Note I did say that the data is USGS and EMSC. That means it is incomplete anyway!

And btw, I expect you to shout from all rooftops worldwide every single theory, thread, website, and thought that you ever have in the future, or else you will be accused of attention seeking. Great, just thought we'd get that straight.

Not quite sure I understand your drift there? Isn't shouting it from everywhere attention seeking?

According to another ATS post, the Facebook guy who predicted the first Earthquake using the Illuminati Card Game will change is profile picture to the Tokyo Tower card 11 hours before the next big one. It sounds like it might be coming soon. Keep a watch on the guy's Facebook page!.. assuming he's not full of BS.

reply to post by munkey66


I think he is pretty confident in his theory, seeing how it just happened!!

MAP 6.1 2011/04/21 13:37:04 35.617 140.452 42.9 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 6.0 2011/04/21 40.306 143.629 7.0 OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

LINK

UH OH

reply to post by TrueAmerican


There seem to be some difference between JMA and USGS/EMSC. JMA have some that USGS/does not. USGS and EMSC have some that JMA does not.

All in all I don't think the lack of JMA data makes a great deal of difference to my listing as they are showing very few that the others do not have.

Issued at Occurred at Region Name Magnitude
03:47 JST 22 Apr 2011 03:44 JST 22 Apr 2011 Kumamoto-ken Kumamoto-chiho M3.9

JMA
01:14 JST 22 Apr 2011 01:11 JST 22 Apr 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M5.6
USGS
2011-04-21T16:11:16.000Z,37.50820,141.26820,5.6000,36.6000,near the east coast of Honshu. Japan

EMSC ONLY (00:07 22/Apr)
2011-04-21T15:07:00.000Z,36.33000,140.22000,4.5000,80.0000,NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU JAPAN

JMA
22:56 JST 21 Apr 2011 22:54 JST 21 Apr 2011 Chiba-ken Toho-oki M4.5
USGS
2011-04-21T13:54:01.000Z,35.60200,140.53090,4.7000,52.9000,near the east coast of Honshu. Japan

USGS (No JMA 22:47 JST)
2011-04-21T13:47:12.000Z,35.76230,140.70360,4.9000,46.1000,near the east coast of Honshu. Japan

JMA
22:40 JST 21 Apr 2011 22:37 JST 21 Apr 2011 Chiba-ken Toho-oki M6.0
USGS
2011-04-21T13:37:03.000Z,35.61680,140.45240,6.1000,42.9000,near the east coast of Honshu. Japan

EMSC ONLY (19:30 JST)
2011-04-21T10:30:31.300Z,37.43000,143.58000,4.5000,2.0000,OFF EAST COAST OF HONSHU JAPAN

JMA
17:21 JST 21 Apr 2011 17:18 JST 21 Apr 2011 Miyagi-ken Oki M5.3
USGS
2011-04-21T08:18:14.000Z,38.33230,142.20660,5.3000,27.8000,near the east coast of Honshu. Japan

USGS ONLY (16:01 JST)
2011-04-21T07:01:12.000Z,38.89650,142.96690,4.5000,22.3000,near the east coast of Honshu. Japan

USGS ONLY (17:08 JST
2011-04-21T03:08:40.000Z,37.28650,142.33740,5.0000,44.3000,off the east coast of Honshu. Japan

USGS ONLY (10:54 JST)
2011-04-21T01:54:41.000Z,40.30590,143.62860,6.0000,7.0000,off the east coast of Honshu. Japan

USGS ONLY (09:39 JST)
2011-04-21T00:39:04.000Z,40.49750,143.47910,5.8000,15.0000,off the east coast of Honshu. Japan

JMA ONLY
05:55 JST 21 Apr 2011 05:51 JST 21 Apr 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M4.3
04:30 JST 21 Apr 2011 04:25 JST 21 Apr 2011 Akita-ken Nairiku-nambu M3.7
04:07 JST 21 Apr 2011 04:04 JST 21 Apr 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M3.8
03:43 JST 21 Apr 2011 03:41 JST 21 Apr 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M3.9

JMA
01:36 JST 21 Apr 2011 01:33 JST 21 Apr 2011 Miyagi-ken Oki M4.5
USGS
2011-04-20T16:33:21.000Z,38.21720,141.65450,4.7000,62.3000,near the east coast of Honshu. Japan

JMA ONLY
00:32 JST 21 Apr 2011 00:29 JST 21 Apr 2011 Ibaraki-ken Oki M4.4
18:29 JST 20 Apr 2011 18:27 JST 20 Apr 2011 Akita-ken Nairiku-nambu M3.7

JMA
17:33 JST 20 Apr 2011 17:30 JST 20 Apr 2011 Ibaraki-ken Oki M4.2
USGS
2011-04-20T08:30:26.000Z,36.95990,140.92560,4.4000,37.3000,near the east coast of Honshu. Japan

USGS ONLY (16:52 JST)
2011-04-20T07:52:19.000Z,36.53790,141.61000,4.6000,34.5000,near the east coast of Honshu. Japan

JMA
09:53 JST 20 Apr 2011 09:50 JST 20 Apr 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M4.9
EMSC (No USGS)
2011-04-20T00:50:54.000Z,37.16000,140.57000,5.0000,30.0000,EASTERN HONSHU JAPAN

USGS ONLY (08:07 JST)
2011-04-19T23:07:02.000Z,34.06050,140.12390,5.1000,90.2000,near the east coast of Honshu. Japan

JMA
07:36 JST 20 Apr 2011 07:34 JST 20 Apr 2011 Niigata-ken Chuetsu-chiho M2.6
06:40 JST 20 Apr 2011 06:38 JST 20 Apr 2011 Ibaraki-ken Oki M4.0

JMA
04:31 JST 20 Apr 2011 04:29 JST 20 Apr 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.5
USGS
2011-04-19T19:29:24.000Z,37.13200,140.96570,4.6000,56.8000,eastern Honshu. Japan

JMA
23:49 JST 19 Apr 2011 23:47 JST 19 Apr 2011 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.5
USGS
2011-04-19T14:47:08.000Z,37.00000,140.72000,4.8000,10.0000,EASTERN HONSHU JAPAN

JMA
23:13 JST 19 Apr 2011 23:10 JST 19 Apr 2011 Ibaraki-ken Nambu M5.0
USGS
2011-04-19T14:10:20.000Z,36.16740,139.61000,5.0000,64.8000,eastern Honshu. Japan

JMA
21:58 JST 19 Apr 2011 21:55 JST 19 Apr 2011 Iwate-ken Oki M4.3
USGS
2011-04-19T12:55:42.000Z,41.20480,141.58400,4.4000,69.8000,Hokkaido. Japan region

JMA
21:37 JST 19 Apr 2011 21:34 JST 19 Apr 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M4.0

JMA
15:56 JST 19 Apr 2011 15:53 JST 19 Apr 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori M4.8
USGS
2011-04-19T06:53:33.000Z,37.09190,140.47060,4.7000,10.1000,eastern Honshu. Japan

JMA and USGS listings


This may be due to catch up but it flags that one needs to be aware for recent events.

The 6.1 that hit the Tokyo area is on Fox as "developing news", not many details as of yet:

www.foxnews.com...

DEVELOPING: TOKYO -- A 6.1 magnitude earthquake struck Japan late Thursday, shaking buildings in the capital Tokyo, the US Geological Survey said.

The quake struck at 10:37 p.m. local time in Chiba prefecture 40 miles east of Tokyo, at a depth of 26.7 miles.

Japan has been hit by a string of aftershocks since the 9.0 magnitude earthquake that struck March 11, unleashing a huge tsunami.

I doubt it caused much (if any) damage since Tokyo is hardened against earthquakes, but it does show that the activity over there is far from over.

Originally posted by TrueAmerican

But because I don't have a degree, my word is crap. Don't listen to me, listen to the earth which is telling you itself, and it's right in your face.

My problem with your thread is that you're passing off what Japanese scientists have been saying since March 11th as your own work, to make yourself look like some kind of clairvoyant.

Originally posted by JaeBea
reply to post by munkey66

 

I think he is pretty confident in his theory, seeing how it just happened!!

what just happened?
what threat just hit Tokyo? did I miss something? how big was the tsunami?

I will make a prediction, there will be another earth quake today in the Japan area today.

Speculation is to those who are powerless as a hammer was to Thor... Mighty, noisy, but irrelevant in the long run.

reply to post by TrueAmerican


I have now completed looking at the two 7 day lists. To make this easier I converted all the USGS/EMSC to JSt and then if they existed in the JMA list I removed them. What we are left with is JMA=Both JMA and USGS, JMA*=JMA Only, JMA~=JMA and EMSC but not USGS, EMSC= EMSC only not JMA or USGS.

There are some very serious holes in this list where USGS has stuff and JMA does not - bigger quakes and JMA has stuff - smaller ones and USGS does not. (In view of one reader's comment may I make it clear the omissions by the USGS of the smaller ones is not important. The fact that JMA does not actually have many, many more is.)

Occurred at Magnitude
JMA* 22 Apr 2011 03:44 3.9
JMA 22 Apr 2011 01:11 5.6
EMSC 22 Apr 2011 00:07 4.5
JMA 21 Apr 2011 22:54 4.5
USGS 21 Apr 2011 22:47 4.9
JMA 21 Apr 2011 22:37 6.0
EMSC 21 Apr 2011 19:30 4.5
JMA 17:18 JST 21 Apr 2011 5.3
USGS 21 Apr 2011 16:01 4.5
USGS 21 Apr 2011 12:08 5.0
USGS 21 Apr 2011 10:54 6.0
USGS 21 Apr 2011 09:39 5.8
JMA* 05:51 JST 21 Apr 2011 4.3
JMA* 04:25 JST 21 Apr 2011 3.7
JMA* 04:04 JST 21 Apr 2011 3.8
JMA* 03:41 JST 21 Apr 2011 3.9
JMA 01:33 JST 21 Apr 2011 4.5
JMA* 00:29 JST 21 Apr 2011 4.4
JMA* 18:27 JST 20 Apr 2011 3.7
JMA 17:30 JST 20 Apr 2011 4.2
USGS 20 Apr 2011 16:52 4.6
JMA~ 09:50 JST 20 Apr 2011 4.9
EMSC 20 Apr 2011 09:50 5.0
USGS 20 Apr 2011 08:07 5.1
JMA* 07:34 JST 20 Apr 2011 2.6
JMA* 06:38 JST 20 Apr 2011 4.0
JMA 04:29 JST 20 Apr 2011 4.5
JMA 23:47 JST 19 Apr 2011 4.5
JMA 23:10 JST 19 Apr 2011 5.0
JMA 21:55 JST 19 Apr 2011 4.3
LMA* 21:34 JST 19 Apr 2011 4.0
JMA 15:53 JST 19 Apr 2011 4.8
JMA 06:34 JST 19 Apr 2011 4.8
USGS 19 Apr 2011 14:05 4.9
USGS 19 Apr 2011 13:51 4.9
USGS 19 Apr 2011 13:04 5
JMA 04:14 JST 19 Apr 2011 4.8
USGS 19 Apr 2011 03:02 4.9
JMA* 02:37 JST 19 Apr 2011 4.1
JMA* 00:07 JST 19 Apr 2011 4.3
USGS 18 Apr 2011 22:03 5
USGS 18 Apr 2011 22:03 3.9
USGS 18 Apr 2011 20:32 4.4
USGS 18 Apr 2011 19:56 4.5
JMA* 17:02 JST 18 Apr 2011 4.2
USGS 18 Apr 2011 16:21 4.4
USGS 18 Apr 2011 12:53 4.6
JMA* 18 Apr 2011 11:08 4.4
USGS 18 Apr 2011 10:30 4.7
JMA* 18 Apr 2011 03:33 4.1
JMA* 18 Apr 2011 03:20 2.7
JMA 18 Apr 2011 03:09 4.4
USGS 18 Apr 2011 02:34 4.6
USGS 18 Apr 2011 01:00 4.7
JMA 18 Apr 2011 00:47 4.8
JMA 23:46 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.4
JMA* 23:10 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.0
JMA 21:51 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.6
JMA 17:03 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.2
USGS 17 Apr 2011 16:12 4.5
JMA 15:49 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.7
JMA 14:38 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.5
JMA 13:39 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.5
JMA 13:24 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.3
USGS 17 Apr 2011 12:00 4.7
USGS 17 Apr 2011 11:56 4.7
USGS 17 Apr 2011 10:54 4.6
JMA 10:38 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.6
USGS 17 Apr 2011 10:02 4.6
USGS 17 Apr 2011 05:54 4.6
USGS 17 Apr 2011 05:36 5.5
JMA 05:21 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.8
JMA 05:19 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.5
JMA* 04:17 JST 17 Apr 2011 3.5
JMA* 01:13 JST 17 Apr 2011 2.7
JMA 00:56 JST 17 Apr 2011 4.8
USGS 16 Apr 2011 18:20 5.2
JMA 16:29 JST 16 Apr 2011 4.1
JMA 13:20 JST 16 Apr 2011 4.4
USGS 16 Apr 2011 12:22 4.3
JMA 11:19 JST 16 Apr 2011 5.9
USGS 16 Apr 2011 06:19 4.8
USGS 16 Apr 2011 06:10 5.0
USGS 16 Apr 2011 05:29 4.3
USGS 16 Apr 2011 04:27 4.6
USGS 16 Apr 2011 02:07 4.5
JMA* 23:34 JST 15 Apr 2011 5.0
JMA* 22:44 JST 15 Apr 2011 4.1
USGS 15 Apr 2011 22:15 4.9
USGS 15 Apr 2011 22:00 5.0
JMA 21:53 JST 15 Apr 2011 4.5
USGS 15 Apr 2011 09:56 4.8
USGS 15 Apr 2011 08:50 4.8
JMA* 08:32 JST 15 Apr 2011 4.3
JMA* 05:00 JST 15 Apr 2011 4.1

Taken from JMA and USGS listing the linkings for which were given in my previous post.

Originally posted by PuterMan
There are some very serious holes in this list where USGS has stuff and JMA does not - bigger quakes and JMA has stuff - smaller ones and USGS does not.

It's right at the top of the USGS recent world earthakes

Latest Earthquakes in the World - Past 7 days

Worldwide earthquakes with M4.5+ located by USGS and Contributing Agencies.
(Earthquakes with M2.5+ within the United States and adjacent areas.)

If they posted everything over 2.5, you wouldn't be able to see most of the map in this part of the world.

reply to post by vox2442


I would suggest that you read the post and look at the quakes. I do not need you to tell me how the USGS operate their lists. That is NOT what I was talking about. You might also like to know that the 4.5 limitation is dropped sometimes to 4 or even lower for quakes that are reported as felt.

I was stating that there are some larger quakes not in the JMA list that are in USGS and vice versa. I am not concerned about the piddly ones - that is TAs area.

Edit: Oh by the way, you may use that USGS list - I do not - I use the 1.0+ 7 day text listing.

If they posted everything over 2.5, you wouldn't be able to see most of the map in this part of the world.

But they managed to post all the quakes of 1.0+ for Baja California and we could still see the map. Around 3000 of them on the map at any given time. Japan does not have a monopoly on large numbers of quakes.

Originally posted by Artorius
UH OH

Why is that an uh oh? They have been having many of these aftershocks off the east coast of Honshu since the big one...

Last Two Weeks of those over 4.0
www.iris.edu...

Just to put things in perspective...

reply to post by PuterMan


How much in Kilo-Tons say the equvilent in A-Bombs since 3/10/11? Remember when USGS called it a 7.9 ,,gee that was off a tad. till today? I'm guessing 200-500 K/T easily.