i have been trying to understand why the universe is expanding, and why the universe is speeding away from us at incredible speeds, and weather these
two factors are related.
what i think is happening is acually an optical illusion created by refractive and reflective optics not the cosmological expansion and near light
speed motion of far distent galaxies.
there is a well know and little understood problem with the red shift of objects that has not to my knowledge been explained, when looking at the
universe around us we see galaxies of different red shift with different size and luminosity, in a linier progresion the glaxies get smaller and less
UP TO Z= 1.5 then something strange happens, the Galaxies "appair" to gain size and luminosity, in a non linier fashion. this has had me head
scratching for a while now and have tryed different senarios to explain the discrepancies but had made no ground in my personal explination of how
this observable effect is achieved.
there are many a mechanism that fit the bill but none have explained the effect.
then i decided to clean my glasses (dirty lenses) and things went out of focus, but close up everything i could see within a short distence was in
focus, and everything past arm length was fuzzy but light seemed to get brighter and create a "larger" brighter source with lines extending from the
light source. i put my glasses back on and everything returned to its normal none fuzzy, sharply focused sky.
this got me thinking about optical distence and focus, could a galaxy at the right distence "appair" larger and more luminous than it is because of
focal distence convergence?
that up to a distence everything is in sharp focus and past that point the focus is non convergant and scattered light instead of focused light is
observed. this "scattering" of light at the focal limit is similar to a short sighted person, everything up to a point is sharp and clear and after
the foci everything is blurry.
using the mecanism of optical focal convergence the red shift dilema started to look like an optical illusion that was scattering light passed the
convergence point in to higher red shifts from the non convergent light source.
everything up to the Z=1.5 red shift is acually moving at the speed we asume from the speed of recesion derived from the red shift observed.
everything past the focal convergence point of Z=1.5 is acually being scattered from our relitive position into a higher red shift than the recesional
speed of that galaxy we are observing.
red shift is the doppler red shift of light as the object producing the light moves away from our apparent position, but if the focal interaction is
non convergent we could derive red shift simply from the "sideways" movement of the scattered light as the light is not focused and the light itself
is streached from the scattered source object.
this is like looking at an object through a telescope with the focus too far past the object, although the telescope can achieve a sharp image its
focus is on the light in its convergent form to achieve a sharp image, the light from that source has a different focal convergence distence.
if we could use two differnt focal limits to study the same object passed Z=1.5 we would IMHO see light acually move sideways on its journey to our
telescopes, this sideways movement would offset the spectra down in the range and produce a red shift.
the light ray is at our telescope is "combined" back into a straight line by removing "sideways movement" of the light source (over focal range) into
its raw form, problem is the information encoded in the light is still shifted sideways from the non focal convergence and this is interperated as red
how to describe the effect of sideways movement of light?
the difference between the glaxies at redshifts 0.1-1.5 is that our focal interaction with the light source is straight or direct (think rays) and the
red shift in this range is "acual doppler red shift"
past this range of focal point an ever increasing amount of the red shift observed is acually a combination of acual doppler shift and scattered out
of convergence light streached by the incorrect focal interaction with the source by our telescopes.
if we add the effect of optics to the model light can behave in ways that are unusual and unexpected,
one point to make is that our universe is full of lenses,
our star has a lense (astrosphere)
our galaxy has a lense (galaxy lense)
our cluster has a lensing effect (cluster lensing)
the lenses interact with each other and factor their effects together,
this provides the optical "prescription" that our focal convergence gives us.
if the galaxy lense is expanding the redshift of everything outside that lense is shifted down
increasing lense generated redshift
not only would this type of optical lense expansion effect light in the red shift we observe
it would also make the universe look like it was expanding (optical illusion)
could a percent of redshift passed 1.5 be explaind by focal convergence errors?
could a percent of redshift be from the expansion of the lense our sun is in (the galaxy lense)?
could these lenses themselves be contributing to redshift directly as a boundry to transition?
what if redshift was not a linier example of cosmological expansion or cosmological ression but an asortment of different factors effecting light?
do we have short sighted glasses on?
without expansion the fact that whole galaxies are moving at near the speed of light would require more energy than avaliable in the entire know
it seems more logical that most of what we see is an illusion
edit on 17-4-2011 by XPLodER because: spelling