posted on Jul, 27 2004 @ 01:12 PM
According to the article, these two people had a prior sexual realationship.
"According to the trial judge's opinion, Ferguson and McKiernan met while working together and had a two-year affair. The relationship waned by late
1993, when Ferguson convinced McKiernan to act as a sperm donor with no responsibility for any child born as a result, the opinion said".
(Can you imagine the dialog that took place? "Well, gee, the relationship isn't working out, and I don't want to spend my life with you, but would
you keep schtupping me so I can get pregnant, then, I swear, I won't go after you for support".....)
The basis of this suit isn't weither they had an "agreement", this suit is really about is the well being of the children.
Both parents are financially responsible for the welfare of the children, the judge ruled correctly.
How can you be "annonymous" when you've been schtupping the same person, a co-worker, for two years?
This has nothing to do with a "sperm bank".
[edit on 27-7-2004 by mako0956]