House Passes One-Week U.S. Budget Extension; Obama Would Veto, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 7-4-2011 @ 06:08 PM by Whereweheaded
April 7 (Bloomberg)


The U.S. House approved a stopgap spending bill to keep the government open through next week, although President Barack Obama said he would veto the measure and a shutdown still looms.


The measure, passed 247-181, would cut another $12 billion in spending this year and fund the Pentagon at current levels through Sept. 30. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, called the bill a “non-starter.”

Reid and House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, returned to the White House today to meet with Obama for talks to try to avert a shutdown at midnight tomorrow.

Leaders of both parties insist they don’t want a shutdown while they maneuver to avoid blame if one occurs.

An administration statement, in threatening a veto of the short-term House measure, said it would be a “distraction” from the budget talks. Reid said the one-week measure is a sure “way to close the government.”

Boehner called on the Senate to act on the bill.

“There is absolutely no policy reason for the Senate not to follow the House in taking these responsible steps to support our troops and keep our government open,” he said on the House floor.



Can anyone explain to me why ( if I understood this correctly ) Obama would veto the measure that was approved and would cut 12 billion in needless spending?



The U.S. House approved a stopgap spending bill to keep the government open through next week, although President Barack Obama said he would veto the measure and a shutdown still looms.


Why veto a cut back on spending?


The measure, passed 247-181, would cut another $12 billion in spending this year and fund the Pentagon at current levels through Sept. 30. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, called the bill a “non-starter.”


Harry Reid is suggesting that not spending 12 billion ( saving it in other words ) and maintaining the current funds for the Pentagon as a "non starter". Really?

Can anyone shed light on the logic behind this?


www.businessweek.com...
edit on 7-4-2011 by Whereweheaded because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 06:16 PM by Whereweheaded
reply to post by Jepic



Well that much we agree on, but whats funny, regardless of Obama or Reid, you got douche bag Boehner over there suggesting:


Boehner called on the Senate to act on the bill.



Im all for saving money..especially tax payer money. Perhaps the bill was unclear to Obama? Perhaps there was non-sense ( that would come as no surprise ) pushed into the bill, maybe thats why Obama said he'd veto it?



reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 06:29 PM by Whereweheaded
reply to post by TheRealJayZ



With all this talk about government shut down, I think it might do the people loads of good?


reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 06:38 PM by Jepic
reply to post by Carseller4



Don't vote Trump man... Vote RP! I think he is much more experienced.


reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 06:39 PM by Carseller4
Originally posted by Jepic
reply to
post by Carseller4



Don't vote Trump man... Vote RP! I think he is much more experienced.




Ron Paul is older than McCain (dirt) and just as kooky......I'll pass on that one.
edit on 7-4-2011 by Carseller4 because: 5 sec rule



reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 06:42 PM by Whereweheaded
reply to post by Carseller4



you may want to research man? RP has a profound knowledge base when it comes to monetary policy, foreign policy and the Constitution. Hell, check out his voting record too~

www.votesmart.org...


reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 06:44 PM by The Sword
reply to post by Whereweheaded



Didn't Rand Paul try pushing something related to abortion when it comes to this shutdown?

Both parties need to understand that this is not the time for partisan grand-standing. This means that such frivolous measures should not be included in any bill to avert a shutdown.

I wonder if that $12 billion includes social programs? If so, then these morons still don't GET IT. If they were willing to shave some money out of the defense budget, there would be no need to cut social programs.


reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 06:44 PM by 0zzymand0s
reply to post by Carseller4



But you'd vote for a marginal hotel owning "businessman" with a track record of layoffs and bankruptcy and a squirrel on his head?

I mean, not that it matters, as west of the Mississippi, Trump is not venerated by anyone as anything more then a celebritard.


reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 06:45 PM by SunnyDee
reply to post by Carseller4



What is Kooky about Ron Paul? Tell me some kooky stuff, cuz I've only seen, read and heard quite rational ideas from the man.



reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 06:51 PM by Jepic
reply to post by Carseller4



Seriously? You guys are in the endgame here. It's possibly the last chance to save America peacefully and you are gonna let his age stop you from voting him? Because he is old!? Who made you guys so materialistic? This is proof of how radically America has changed. It now stands for the total opposite of what it was conceived as.
edit on 7-4-2011 by Jepic because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 06:52 PM by Whereweheaded
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to
post by Whereweheaded



Didn't Rand Paul try pushing something related to abortion when it comes to this shutdown?

Both parties need to understand that this is not the time for partisan grand-standing. This means that such frivolous measures should not be included in any bill to avert a shutdown.

I wonder if that $12 billion includes social programs? If so, then these morons still don't GET IT. If they were willing to shave some money out of the defense budget, there would be no need to cut social programs.



Sure they can cut money from social programs. Social programs or ( welfare ) is Unconstitutional anyhow!


reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 07:11 PM by The Sword
reply to post by Whereweheaded



Having a military that goes on adventures around the world is unconstitutional too.

But, I don't see anyone on here complaining about that.

Typical.


reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 07:36 PM by 0zzymand0s
reply to post by The Sword



I am 100% against the military / security industrial complex.

How's that?


reply posted on 7-4-2011 @ 10:36 PM by Whereweheaded
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to
post by Whereweheaded



Having a military that goes on adventures around the world is unconstitutional too.

But, I don't see anyone on here complaining about that.

Typical.



You do realize that the military doesn't go on these excursions without the commander in chiefs say so right? Why not point the finger at the culprit, and not the messenger. Obama is the commander in chief like it or not. Why not address that? Oh thats right, Obama and his supporters wouldnt dare to take actual responsibility for their actions, that would be to much to ask~
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 19 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 7 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 13 days ago with 23 member flags
US judge blocks indefinite detention of Americans
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags