It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by coyotepoet
Are you willing to admit that at least some of the trails across the sky are indeed “chemtrails” whatever their purpose may be?
Of course some of these trails are simply contrails, but not all of them. To turn it into an all-or-nothing prospect on either side is equally ignorant. People, at least those who are open minded, intuitively understand/feel/know that something is not right about some of these lines in the sky. If they are indeed not all innocent contrails that then begs the question, why? What purpose do these lines serve? Many ideas have been put forth as people seek to understand what their intuition is telling them. Some may be correct, some may not be. These ideas include (in no particular order)
1) Geoengineering
2) Mind Control/dumbing down
3) Eugenics/population control/sterilization
4) Increasing the number of sick people to benefit the pharmaceutical company
5) Aspect of HAARP or Bluebeam projects
6) Using weather as a weapon
7) A new type of weapons technology being tested on unsuspecting guinea pigs
8) GMO's (like Monsanto's aluminium resistant crops)
9) Creating rain/drought/etc (an offshoot of geoengineering)
10) To block the sun/blue sky for whatever reason.
Or, as one debunker sarcastically suggested
11) Benignly spraying us with vitamins and minerals to help us live longer and be more healthy
Originally posted by coyotepoet
reply to post by badw0lf
So that's it then? Those who agree with you are correct and those who disagree with you are close minded? Seems to me you're propping up your own defense by stating there is no reasonable alternative - then hiding it under the guise of asking a question. Tisk tisk...
Isn't that exactly what the debunkers do? That is precisely my point.edit on 28-3-2011 by coyotepoet because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Nobama
As I have posted before in other threads, OP I want you to view a Jet next time with binoculars, you will notice that the "chemtrails" come from the Jet's engines...now if they were spraying it would come from nozzles or a release valve of sorts.
No, I have personally spent many hours researching this issue. The answer is not simple as you suggest. There are many more complicated aspects and issues involved.
First let me state, again as mere speculation, that one of the strongest reasons for this is geoengineering. One of the most popular theories among the scientists of the methods we could use are jet aircraft emissions. This may not apply just to jet exhaust emissions but other emissions that Jets could emit by being a transport system for aerosols. This is a fact that is being looked into very deeply by many scientists.
They are trying to figure out how to use these methods in a controlled way that will be effective. However this is a very delicate field of nature they are tinkering with. It could have catastrophic effects if handled carelessly.
They have determined through studies already done that if 1% of jet emissions were to be elevated in altitude by 10,000 feet or so, then that would help in global cooling. But the problem is most modern aircraft do not fly high enough to have the beneficial effect. So aircraft emissions are not going to do the job well enough. Then the spray would enter and combine with the normal exhaust and the heat from the jet engines.
The geoengineeriong scientists have determined that extra aerosol must be injected into the atmosphere at a very high altitude to have a beneficial cooling effect on the Earths albedo. They have devised special particles based on designs of seed pods and dandelions that have an umbrella like shape and aerodynamic lift qualities to them. This is so the material used to radiate and absorb the energies necessary will stay airborne as long as possible.
It is likely that all methods for getting as much aerosols in the atmosphere that they can get away with at one time are being used. They have even studied trying to replicate a volcano. A strong possibility, if you have looked into this subject, will appear. Alter the jet fuel so that it contains more emissions than normal. To make this feasable the fuel needs to burn hotter than normal. Both the factors of extra particulates and extra heat would then be able to explain why the modern contrails persist.
EDIT: My problem is that it is not being openly discussed and studied publicly.
Internationally renowned photographer Yann Arthus-Bertrand makes his feature directorial debut with this environmentally conscious documentary produced by Luc Besson, and narrated by Glenn Close. Shot in 54 countries and 120 locations over 217 days, Home presents the many wonders of planet Earth from an entirely aerial perspective. As such, we are afforded the unique opportunity to witness our changing environment from an entirely new vantage point. In our 200,000 years on Earth, humanity has hopelessly upset Mother Nature's delicate balance. Some experts claim that we have less than ten years to change our patterns of consumption and reverse the trend before the damage is irreversible. Produced to inspire action and encourage thoughtful debate, Home poses the prospect that unless we act quickly, we risk losing the only home we may ever have.
Personnel The agency employs 71 civilians, eight officers and 19 enlisted military members. In addition to this staff, AFPA uses seven contractors as its partners.
Air Force Research Laboratory, with headquarters at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, was created in October 1997. The laboratory was formed through the consolidation of four former Air Force laboratories and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.
Any one or all of them could be possible and valid reasons for the trails that aren't contrails.
Originally posted by Essan
Originally posted by coyotepoet
Are you willing to admit that at least some of the trails across the sky are indeed “chemtrails” whatever their purpose may be?
There is no evidence that any of the trails seen across the sky are anything other than normal contrails.
Nor is there any evidence that if any form of spraying for whatever reason were being undertaken then it would looks like contrails.
This does not mean such spraying does not happen.
The Regulation of Geoengineering Fifth Report of Session 2009–10 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 10 March 2010
I wouldn't expect you to be open-minded enough to read and accept some of the possibly incriminating references contained therein by your very own House of Commons Science and Technology Committee.
Are you willing to admit that at least some of the trails across the sky are indeed “chemtrails” whatever their purpose may be?
Originally posted by network dude
Assuming that what everyone sees in the sky is more than a condensate trail left from aircraft exhaust in cloud forming conditions, I would say we are being sprayed with vitamins and minerals meant to increase life expectancy.
Based on this information I can look at almost any country in the world and see that the life expectancy is ever increasing. Should we discover that chemtrails are real, I think we should be thanking the perpetrators of this phenomenon.
1) Geoengineering If you have been reading the papers and articles that MatthiasAndrew has been so generously contributing to every thread, you would know that geoengineering is entirely theoretical, and probably beyond our current technology. There has been concern about the effects of high altitude jets since the 1970's, but this research has been inconclusive. The volume of evidence that MatthiasAndrew has unearthed suggests that there is no attempt to keep this scientific debate secret.
“I WISH there was absolutely no requirement for us to be here today launching a program focused on the prevention of suicide within the ADF.” Director-General Defence Health Services Air Commodore Tony Austin made that comment at the launch of the ADF’s new Suicide Prevention Program (SPP) on September 10 to mark World Suicide Prevention Day. Suicide is the third highest cause of deaths in the ADF. There are about seven or eight suicides a year and since 1996 there have been 462 reported cases of non-fatal related behaviour.