ATS's Boondock-Saint for US President - Would you vote for me ???

page: 3
66
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:06 AM
link   
I agree with much of the time, but you are a mason which is a huge no no!




posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:06 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Perhaps we should work together across boarders i mean to make the world a better place




ATS Thread ( Havick007 ) - Sovereign Party of Australia


+4 more 
posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
to be quite honest, I'd rather you know me than to vote blindly.


Which is why I wouldn't vote for you and I'm surprised you are still a member here really and not banned for your blatant breaking of one of the biggest ATS rules some time ago. Friends in high places is the only reason you're still posting.

Of course, to be a politician one HAS to lie so I'm not surprised about this thread and your efforts to fool yourself and others into thinking you are trustworthy.

How about a "no comment" just for authenticity, or maybe you'd prefer a good dragging through the mud?

Better still, why not tell us all about it in your own words?



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by zroth
How would you end the corporation knows as THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA and return the nation to the people?

Since I am not a lawyer or a constitutionalists,
I alone could not fix this problem. However,
I would create a small 10 person task force
to investigate how to resolve this issue while
still adhering to our constitution. And then
with the support of the population implement
those solutions.


Originally posted by zroth
How would you address the lack of focus on our youth?


I think a lot of this is due to poor parenting.
Folks have to work so much that they spend
very little time with their kids. So it's not just
a youth problem, we all share this responsibility.


Originally posted by zroth
How would you escape the shackles of the federal reserve?


I have already addressed this question.
I would end the Fed and the US Treasury
would assume the role without Timothy
Geithner. I would declare the Fed an illegal
entity and cancel all it's contracts toward
the US Government marked null and void.
It's current membership prosecuted for illegal
acts against the US.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:16 AM
link   
Are you planning on answering my questions or will they just be ignored?

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by Juston
I'd be curious as to your stance on our current foreign policy and whether you support the US becoming non interventionist.

I do believe the US sticks it's nose where
it doesn't belong. Just because you get
oil from a country does not give you the
right to invade or attack them due to
their internal conflicts. Find another source
of power so we can stop this blood for
oil exchange.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:17 AM
link   
What about a debate? Similar to any other nominee debate, with a one post answer to questions posted by a designated member. It would go a long way to not only get out all of the answers to Boondock's stance but also allegations presented against him? I doubt it would work but it would be interesting.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by nerbot
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


I would never vote for you because I know you are a liar.

Simple really.




What did he lie about?



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by DrCarter
What about a debate? Similar to any other nominee debate, with a one post answer to questions posted by a designated member. It would go a long way to not only get out all of the answers to Boondock's stance but also allegations presented against him? I doubt it would work but it would be interesting.


An get them in writing with a date stamp...



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by facelift
reply to post by boondock-saint
 

If it wasn't for your Airspoon MIA? thread, I'd consider it, as anyone with that many 'friends' knows how to work the system quite well...
But sadly, that thread drives home the point that you are quite needy...and that's a No-Go for that position.
Either way - good luck...

thank you for your response

I will have to say what makes
my friends separate from those people in
political office,

Mine are not PAID for. They are earned.

And as far as Airspoon goes, I was truly
concerned for his well being.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by naught
Only if
you promised to
stop typing
in such
a horribly
annoying manner


lol, sorry it bothers you so much.

Like I said I am human and with being
human has it's flaws.

I have bad eye sight and it requires
me to have my text enlarged on the screen
to see it. Thusly causing my post boxes to have
a scroll. If I type in smaller lines, it makes it
easy so I do not have to scroll.

I apologize for having bad eye sight



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:27 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Sorry, not a chance in hell!

Your little "Constitutional Gestapo Squad" idea scares the hell out of me.

Giving a small group of people with no oversight power to execute elected officials is not my idea of a good leader.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:28 AM
link   
How do you plan to end this hidden dictatorship in America?

2nd line.
edit on 25-3-2011 by Rockdisjoint because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
What is your stance on equal treatment under the law, specifically, making the state sanctioned institution of marriage available to people of all sexual preferences?


I think the Fed Gov should stay out of the bedroom.
I think this is a scenario that needs addressing
on a state level with each state determining it's own
course of action.

However, there would be no Fed law prohibiting
anybody from having whatever partner they choose.

On a side note, I am not gay but if you are that
your choice depending on what your state mandates.



Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
What is your stance on the woman's right to make her own reproductive decisions?


A women's body belongs to her and her alone.
No Fed law would make that decision for her.


Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
What is your stance on the "war on drugs" and the illegality of recreational drugs?

there is no war on drugs. there is an image
to the public of the war on drugs, but in reality
there isn't one. It is a means to extract budget
funds from congress. Once again, this is a
state issue. If your state wants to legalize
marijuana and the voters approve of it. Then
no Fed law should supersede that ruling.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by mayabong
Hi if you're elected will you be getting rid of the EPA?

No, not entirely.
But I will suggest sweeping reforms
to it's function and directives. It will
no longer look the other way to
corporate misconduct. And it will be
held accountable to the public
for it's shortcomings. Americans
need this program, else many dangers
lurk in the environment which the
public would have no clue about.
Radiation plumes floating in from
Japan would be a prime example
of it's necessity.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:39 AM
link   
The best president is the one who doesnt want the job,not the one who sells his soul for the job.

But i like your passion,as passion doesn't look beyond the moment of its existence or brillance.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by Whereweheaded
Would you deem illegal all feminist activity on the grounds that they are insane idiots?

well that would depend on the governments definition
of the term insane. As it may differ from the
feminists. If a court determines a person
insane, then certain measures have to be
implemented to protect them and also the
public at large. If you are talking about
just demonstrating in a protest, then I wouldn't
consider that insane, I would consider that
as someone exercising their rights.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:43 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 





A women's body belongs to her and her alone. No Fed law would make that decision for her.



So the man in the relationship has no bearing what so ever, if there is a child in question? Just lost my vote~



Thats the problem with our Family Courts system, they are way to biased towards women, with the mans " say" being deemed irrelevant. Without the mans " seed " the child in question would not exist. Remember, it takes two to tango.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Frankenchrist
If you are anything like the writer and director of The Boondock Saints, I would not vote for you. That man is a piece of $h!t!

I have no connection to anyone
involved with the movies of the same name.

I chose this username here because
boondock saint was shorter than
hillbilly christian.

Which I am a practicing Evangelical Christian
if that question is asked in the future.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 11:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by BuckNutty
Would you be willing to show your birth certificate?

Yes, I would be willing to show it
when I filed the documents to
actually run.





new topics

top topics



 
66
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join