It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

American Military Targeting Israel?

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:37 PM
link   
So I came upon this WND article, and thought it raised an important point. While I probably would shrug off any possibility of this because of high level Jewish control in the US, (and the fact that author Klein has a history of taking the Jewish plight over the edge), the question of precedent this attack on Libya raises might be worth discussing:


JERUSALEM – Could President Obama's decision to sidestep Congress and strike Libya as part of an international coalition put the U.S. on a military collision course with Israel?

While the prospect of American or Western forces confronting Israeli troops may seem remote, one Middle East policy expert is warning the precedent set by Obama in agreeing to target Libya opens the door to other possible United Nations-backed confrontations, including perhaps one day with Israel.

"Particularly concerning is the prospect that what we might call the Gaddafi Precedent will be used in the not-to-distant future to justify and threaten the use of U.S. military forces against an American ally: Israel," writes Frank Gaffney Jr., president of the Center for Security Policy.


www.wnd.com...

Why is it we can't seem to get Congressional approval for just about any US military action since WWII?

The base premise of Klein here though cannot be overlooked just because of his history. What if a bunch of Arab countries secured the backing of the UN to define those lines, Israel disagreed, but the US agreed as well and UN military was brought in to oversee the division? The US could be faced with sending military into Israel, if it is the UN that really runs this place now.


Let's get smelly in da Skunk Works. Cause either this article is just pushing Jewish agenda through fear, or it sheds light on a curve ball that few would ever imagine possible.

I guess the implementation of Greater Israel right now in our faces was not enough. Huh Klein?




posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 04:59 PM
link   
Never in a million years would they do that or Britain or France, it is the "Motherland " to the money holders/lenders of all those co-operations, bankers the federal reserves...all of them. This is why Hitler hated them sooo much they corner industries and then poor their money back into the mother land and not back into the very system that makes them wealthy in the first place ruining economy and causing inflated prices.

If there is a source that says american are bombing Israel i can assure you they are wrong.
edit on 23-3-2011 by gmac10001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:10 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


There was congressional approval for the 2nd Iraq war. If you notice the Prez is a Dem and congress is led by the GOP. If the Prez was GOP then we would have ground troops in there by now. If congress was Dem then they would still be debating sending any military in at all.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:13 PM
link   
If 9/11 is to be reinvestigated properly it would raise a lot of tension and redistribute some power. Perhaps a contingency plan like this is an option to stop things getting too far out of hand. Germany has recently stopped turning a blind eye to the Palestine issue and something needs to change if peace is to come to the region. It does sound like there are quite a few preparing and some pushing for WW3 in that region. The rest of the world seams content enough to just keep living on so something is required to prevent a chain reaction.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:19 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


How could the UN pass a resolution with US veto power used so often in relation to Israel ??
Never gonna happen....



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:23 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


Why is it we can't seem to get Congressional approval for just about any US military action since WWII?

The base premise of Klein here though cannot be overlooked just because of his history. What if a bunch of Arab countries secured the backing of the UN to define those lines, Israel disagreed, but the US agreed as well and UN military was brought in to oversee the division? The US could be faced with sending military into Israel, if it is the UN that really runs this place now.

To answer your question: We can't get congreesional approval; because it does not pretain to the individual state as the constitution requires. It pretains to the UN and that is the NWO, American citizens have no say in the NWO, the District of Columbia is a country all it's own.
Second: The US Military is the Military Force for the NWO. The UN is the Head if the NWO. If the UN says bomb Isreal, the US must comply as they have joined the UN and are now dictated to by them.

If you research the past couple years, you will find that the US has been pulling back from Israel. Hillary Clinton herself, (who during her husbands terms in office reiterated over and over she would never forsake Israel) yet she, for the last 2 years been bashing them. Obama has continues to ignore the state of Israel since is Presidency began. Some say it is his Hatred for Jews; but basically it is his love for the NWO, because they put him in the office and he is indebted to do as they request. Israel will have to forsake it's sovereignty in order to join with the NWO. They won't. That is why over the last 2 years the US has repeated blamed Israel for not attaining a peace treaty with Hamas. To this I say, BS. Would the US sign a peace treaty with a country they knew had 1 and only 1 agenda, Distruction of their country and state and way of life. Death of the Israel state and every Jewish believer in it, Death of the state of Israel is the only peace agreement Hamas (the so called" in our words" President of the Palistine) will accept. Would you sign a peace treaty with them if you were Israel? Israel had agreed to every request from the Palitines for the past 10 years, they gave up land only to have Hamas fire bombs at them, it doesn't matter what Israel agrees to, Hamas will take it and then fire bombs, Ask Hillary and the Pres why Hamas will not sign a sucurity agreement with Israel. I'll answer that for them: Because it means Hamas will have to abide by a cease fire agreement, recognize Israel as a state and play by peace rule set by the UN.(NWO). Never going to happen.
edit on 23-3-2011 by mesle123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by js331975
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


There was congressional approval for the 2nd Iraq war. If you notice the Prez is a Dem and congress is led by the GOP. If the Prez was GOP then we would have ground troops in there by now. If congress was Dem then they would still be debating sending any military in at all.


Your missing a very important fact. Congress was never asked about any of this. There is a substantial difference there. Not to mention the only reason the US went into Iraq was to get a foothold into the middle east as part of a bigger plan. They tried in 1990 with the 1st war; but because there was no actual effect on the US had to pull out. The US new the arab nations hated hussain, when 911 happen it gave them the perfect opt for them to go in. It didn't matter that Iraq had nothing to do with 911, it was a shot and they took it, knowing they would not get to much flack from the arab nations because they hated hussain. They suceeded in getting a foot hold with 3 seoarate military baces in the middle east in order to fight the war.
If anyone thinks that the US is supposedly taking a back seat in the lybian war, think again. The only reason US won't put forces on the ground is to protect thier image. They stood with the UN and actually used their voice to push the resolution through, but there main agenda is total control militarially in the region, to do this they have to walk on glass and always try to prove to the arab nation, their on their side for the sake of world peace. HA! For the sake of the NWO. You mark these words; "By the time the UN gets to IRAN, they will have every Arab Nation behind them and this time they will not be able to back pedal their way out like they are doing with Lybia.

And the US Miilitary ( NWO Military)will be leading the way!
edit on 23-3-2011 by mesle123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by gmac10001
Never in a million years would they do that or Britain or France, it is the "Motherland " to the money holders/lenders of all those co-operations, bankers the federal reserves...all of them. This is why Hitler hated them sooo much they corner industries and then poor their money back into the mother land and not back into the very system that makes them wealthy in the first place ruining economy and causing inflated prices.

If there is a source that says american are bombing Israel i can assure you they are wrong.
edit on 23-3-2011 by gmac10001 because: (no reason given)


Not so fast - stranger things have happened. The bigger you are the harder you fall and Isreal could well be manouvered into a position that isn't so easy to get out of. Take a look at this video - graphic and straight to the point.
It's all coming together now.
www.davidicke.com...



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 06:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by mesle123

Originally posted by js331975
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


There was congressional approval for the 2nd Iraq war. If you notice the Prez is a Dem and congress is led by the GOP. If the Prez was GOP then we would have ground troops in there by now. If congress was Dem then they would still be debating sending any military in at all.


Your missing a very important fact. Congress was never asked about any of this. There is a substantial difference there. Not to mention the only reason the US went into Iraq was to get a foothold into the middle east as part of a bigger plan. They tried in 1990 with the 1st war; but because there was no actual effect on the US had to pull out. The US new the arab nations hated hussain, when 911 happen it gave them the perfect opt for them to go in. It didn't matter that Iraq had nothing to do with 911, it was a shot and they took it, knowing they would not get to much flack from the arab nations because they hated hussain. They suceeded in getting a foot hold with 3 seoarate military baces in the middle east in order to fight the war.
If anyone thinks that the US is supposedly taking a back seat in the lybian war, think again. The only reason US won't put forces on the ground is to protect thier image. They stood with the UN and actually used their voice to push the resolution through, but there main agenda is total control militarially in the region, to do this they have to walk on glass and always try to prove to the arab nation, their on their side for the sake of world peace. HA! For the sake of the NWO. You mark these words; "By the time the UN gets to IRAN, they will have every Arab Nation behind them and this time they will not be able to back pedal their way out like they are doing with Lybia.

And the US Miilitary ( NWO Military)will be leading the way!
edit on 23-3-2011 by mesle123 because: (no reason given)


The chess pieces are all in place - it's all going to plan as it always does and the division they planned ions ago is working perfectly.







 
4

log in

join