It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Attero Auctorita
You would probably like to have the assault rifle if an oppressive government took over the USA (which is really the whole reason to keep the 2nd amendment). Just my opinion.
Originally posted by Shoktek
Originally posted by Attero Auctorita
You would probably like to have the assault rifle if an oppressive government took over the USA (which is really the whole reason to keep the 2nd amendment). Just my opinion.
Back in the old days of our fore fathers, the second amendment was written to arm the state militias...in those days, the state militias actually could use their weapons to fight back against tyranny in the government. These days, the federal government runs everything...there are no more real state militias, and if the government wants to be oppressive, they will be, and there's nothing you can do about it with an assault rifle.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
There is 80 million plus gun owners in america all voting age.make your vote count
Originally posted by RANT
I disagree with the premise and it's conclusions, but I appreciate the effort.
Especially considering one could easily reverse it, change a few names and assert the much more likely scenario that Bush will manage to get a woman's right to reproductive soverenty outlawed in the next four years resulting in dangerous and deadly alley and home abortions and the incarceration (literally and figuratively) of American women.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
There is 80 million plus gun owners in america all voting age.make your vote count
There's upwards of 150 million women in America. Make your vote count too.
. . .
When candidate Kerry talks about his undying support for the Second Amendment, there are two words he never utters. In announcing what he says he recognizes as a "right," Kerry never utters the word "individual." And more importantly, he never repeats the all-important word of the framers--"keep." As we all know, the Second Amendment says in part, " . . . The right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Keeping arms: That means ordinary men and women owning guns; possessing guns; keeping firearms for whatever peaceable reasons we might have.
You won�t find the full phrase--"the right to keep and bear arms"--anywhere on his Web site, or in Kerry`s speeches, his floor statement, his media interviews or press releases.
Kerry`s version of the Second Amendment is that Americans only have the right to bear arms. That verbal sleight of hand fits right in with what the ban-the-gun crowd wants--a future declaration by a Kerry-packed U.S. Supreme Court that the Second Amendment was never intended as an individual right, but that it merely allows the states to muster forces to serve in the National Guard.
Proof of that trickery came during Kerry`s Senate speech supporting the Clinton gun ban on semi-automatic firearms. Kerry told the Senate and the nation, "For those who want to wield those weapons, we have a place for them. It is the U.S. military. And we welcome them."
. . .
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
I think you are right no one man with a assualt rifle is going to make a difference. But you have to remember there are 80 million gun owners in the united states. Iraq is the most recent evidence of what lightly armed insurgents can do to the strongest military on earth. Thats only a couple hundred or thousand of them now imagine 80million of those insurgents. Imagine the damage that many even lightly armed people could do to any military.
Originally posted by koji_K
i was under the impression that the national guard was a state militia?
Originally posted by Shoktek
, there is no organization of gun owners ready for a battle.
[edit on 22-7-2004 by Shoktek]
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
I wouldnt be so sure of that that let me introduce you to the Michigan Militia
michiganmilitia