It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A recent book exposes what Darwin got wrong about sexual behavior in birds, and what his error tells us about the evolution of scientific knowledge.
...In Victorian England it simply wasn’t appropriate for a well-respected gentleman scientist to draw attention to the existence of female promiscuity, let alone to justify it in biological terms.
Confirmation of widespread female (and male) promiscuity among otherwise socially monogamous birds came from detailed behavioral observations and, beginning in the mid-1980s, parentage studies using the new, extremely powerful method of DNA fingerprinting.
The results are startling. Almost every bird species previously assumed to be faithful exhibits some degree of infidelity. Certainly, there are a few truly monogamous birds, such as the mute swan, but in most species some females have some of their eggs fertilized by males other than their partner. In species like the European reed bunting, despite the maintenance of a monogamous pair bond, more than 75 percent of all eggs are fertilized by other males’ sperm.
The benefit of promiscuity for males is clear—more offspring. But what do females gain from being unfaithful? Despite 25 years of research, and paternity studies of some 150 species, we still do not know the answer. It may be that just as with the shift in evolutionary thinking in the early 1970s, another paradigm shift in our thinking is required to answer this question.
Some birds bread as a couple for life and others don't.
Obviously this proves that we don't know all there is too yet.
Also can anyone name any 100% fool proof Theory?
I'm a male and I believe in monogamy... Now what?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by soficrow
Hey you left out this part of my reply...
Also can anyone name any 100% fool proof Theory?
Originally posted by soficrow
reply to post by xxshadowfaxx
I'm a male and I believe in monogamy... Now what?
You don't get to play.
This thread is about observable behavior and misrepresentations of "biology" as scientific "fact" for the purpose of manipulating women politically and economically.
...Well, maybe you could play if you disclose that you have been personally manipulated into supporting the current economic and political paradigm.