It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by moosevernel
I would just like to add to my last post that to me instigating a no fly zone and bombing AA as has been proposed is foreign intervention no?
Also Who have the Libians supposedly asked for help from, and do you have any sources because i would genuinely like to see them.
The president of Libya's newly-formed National Council has told Sky News that if Tripoli does not liberate itself then the rebel army will take it by force. In his first interview since being elected, Mustafa Abdul-Jalil appealed to the international community for help.
He said: "Tripoli is fighting against oppression and when it falls the regime will follow. Now the support around (Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi) is collapsing.
"What we want is an air embargo to stop Gaddafi bringing in mercenaries."
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
Originally posted by moosevernel
I would just like to add to my last post that to me instigating a no fly zone and bombing AA as has been proposed is foreign intervention no?
Also Who have the Libians supposedly asked for help from, and do you have any sources because i would genuinely like to see them.
The president of Libya's newly-formed National Council has told Sky News that if Tripoli does not liberate itself then the rebel army will take it by force. In his first interview since being elected, Mustafa Abdul-Jalil appealed to the international community for help.
He said: "Tripoli is fighting against oppression and when it falls the regime will follow. Now the support around (Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi) is collapsing.
"What we want is an air embargo to stop Gaddafi bringing in mercenaries."
news.sky.com...
Originally posted by moosevernel
reply to post by MikeboydUS
A picture speaks a thousand words so they say.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/81ff7f1a03cf.jpg[/atsimg]edit on 1/3/11 by moosevernel because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nonnez
A picture speaks a thousand words so they say.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/81ff7f1a03cf.jpg[/atsimg]edit on 1/3/11 by moosevernel because: (no reason given)
Indeed, it does speak a thousand words. Any idea if this photo is taken in Libya, or is the photo taken outside Libya where they would have access to such fine printing equipment to make such a professional banner? It just seems awfully professional a banner to have been produced in Libya under such chaotic conditions, and according to reports, minimal technological luxuries.
Don't get me wrong. I, like most Libyans, believe that imposing a no-fly zone would be a good way to deal the regime a hard blow on many levels; it would cut the route of the mercenary convoys summoned from Africa, it would prevent Gaddafi from smuggling money and other assets, and most importantly it would stop the regime from bombing weapons arsenals that many eyewitnesses have maintained contain chemical weapons; something that would unleash an unimaginable catastrophe, not to mention that his planes might actually carry such weapons. Nevertheless, one thing seems to have united Libyans of all stripes; any military intervention on the ground by any foreign force would be met – as Mustafa Abud Al Jeleil, the former justice minister and head of the opposition-formed interim government, said – with fighting much harsher than what the mercenaries themselves have unleashed. Nor do I favour the possibility of a limited air strike for specific targets. This is a wholly popular revolution, the fuel to which has been the blood of the Libyan people. Libyans fought alone when western countries were busy ignoring their revolution at the beginning, fearful of their interests in Libya. This is why I'd like the revolution to be ended by those who first started it: the people of Libya.
The change in rhetoric from Britain came as the US made clear it would adopt a more cautious approach and European diplomats expressed surprise at Cameron's rhetoric. Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, giving evidence to the House foreign affairs committee , suggested military intervention by the US and other countries might be counter-productive. She said the administration was aware that the Libyan opposition was anxious to be seen "as doing this by themselves on behalf of the Libyan people – that there not be outside intervention by any external force. We respect that."
Originally posted by moosevernel
It is no business of ours. They do not want foreign intervention. Nuff said.
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
reply to post by moosevernel
We arn't going to use airstrikes. SecDef Gates pretty much ruled that out earlier.
We will assist the opposition in any way that does not offend them or bring dishonor upon us, i.e. humanitarian relief (food/medicine), supply drops (weapons/ammo), and foreign aid (money).
Originally posted by Pr0t0
The only interest or concern western governments have with Libya is purely based on oil. Oil has rocketed 10% since the Libyan crackdown.
But, why is it that we don't see calls for Mubarak, Ben Ali, Abdullah Salem or Suleiman to face this type of intervention and face internation war crimes trials... because we're really not that interested in their exports.
Originally posted by psilo simon
Can I ask someone to explain to me how a no fly zone would be enforced? From what I can figure out myself it would require Gaddafi to adhere to the no fly zone, and if he did`nt would action be taken against him and would it be military action?