It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The United States was concerned about speaking publicly about military options while a large number of Americans remained in Libya.Most have now left.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
And the race card? My opinion...as stated.
The election's been...another one coming up. Man up.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Canada has its own elections. Why not man up and go get involved in those - first - before even thinking about concerning yourself with ours?
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by centurion1211
So, what good does it do the U.S. to be a (or the only) super power, if we are now afraid to use that power when and where it is sorely needed?
It motivates the citizenry to vote the " right " way next time, and ensure that no weak minded, empty suit steps in the oval office ever again, thus eradicating the liberal agenda.
Lord knows, with your brisk economy, you could use another war. How come big government is suddenly redeemed if it goes out and stomps on brown people? I'd hold back on some of that aggression and concentrate instead on rebuilding at home before you blow up and rebuild somebody else, eh?
Sad excuse for a post IMO.
First, Neither I or the OP suggested more wars. I think the OP was more about getting and staying engaged in all the issues instead of appearing to hang back and wait for a situation to either be decided on its own (after many deaths), or do nothing at all.
And last, you really had to play the race card in your post? Whatever for?
You have a prudent waiting period assuming the facts aren't all in. You are assuming that inaction equates weakness. And the race card? My opinion...as stated. The election's been...another one coming up. Man up.
Meanwhile...how about addressing the point about the unknown quantity to the whole affair? There is more to this than your dislike for Obama. Really. Think past the party line.edit on 28-2-2011 by JohnnyCanuck because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 46ACE
All we lack is the will to reassert ourselves. perhaps islamic "terrorists" and states like north Korea would think twice. about poking us if we stood tall again. We paid for all the toys and have improved our skills and coordination...
Originally posted by Cobaltic1978
reply to post by maybereal11
What good do you think this will do? A: Prevent Gaddafi from bombing his own people. He has already tried several times but pilots have defected/ejected/gone awol etc.
Why would they go into Libya? A: Not go in, unlikely, but enforce a no fly zone.
How are they going to do it? A: see above
Which country do you support? A: Strange question...in what context? I don't support Gaddafi.I support the pro democratic movement in Libya and I support the Libyan people determining thier own future.
From what angle(where) will they come in from? A: tarting to wonder here...what does this question mean? Plus the one above?
edit on 18/02/2011 by Cobaltic1978 because: Because Becauseedit on 18/02/2011 by Cobaltic1978 because: Did I?
Originally posted by centurion1211
Great question.
Add to that should we care if they don't? My answer would be yes.
This is what is being said in the UK on this subject.
source
The débacle of Washington’s handling of the Libya issue is symbolic of a wider problem at the heart of the Obama administration’s foreign policy. The fact that it took ten days and at least a thousand dead on the streets of Libya’s cities before President Obama finally mustered the courage to call for Muammar “mad dog” Gaddafi to step down is highly embarrassing for the world’s only superpower, and emblematic of a deer-in-the-headlights approach to world leadership. Washington seems incapable of decisive decision-making on foreign policy at the moment, a far cry from the days when it swept entire regimes from power, and defeated America’s enemies with deep-seated conviction and an unshakeable drive for victory.
Just a few years ago the United States was genuinely feared on the world stage, and dictatorial regimes, strategic adversaries and state sponsors of terror trod carefully in the face of the world’s most powerful nation. Now Washington appears weak, rudderless and frequently confused in its approach. From Tehran to Tripoli, the Obama administration has been pathetically slow to lead, and afraid to condemn acts of state-sponsored repression and violence.
So, what good does it do the U.S. to be a (or the only) super power, if we are now afraid to use that power when and where it is sorely needed?edit on 2/28/2011 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)