It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kryties
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by Kryties
Nice thread. Made me think if there is so much evidence for his innocence then what was the evidence against him then?
Shaky, blurry video and the fact he was there. As far as I can make out that's about the crux of it.
Start with the date, then go from there. Thats all i got.
Originally posted by haveblue
Has anyone checked Wikileaks?......there might be a cable somewhere containing implicating information. Problem is..where to start looking for that cable if it exists.
Originally posted by backinblack
My only question is why is the mother saying this now when she supposedly was the one that convinced him to plead guilty which bypassed most of the evidence being tested in court..
My guess would be she thought he was guilty at the time ( as did the rest of Australia). She then had her eyes opened by others who seen through the bs . I am pretty sure she even met Joe Vialls during her travels around Australia.
I still think it is quite realistic to believe that she had no idea of all of the irregularities with her sons case 7 months later when he went to trial.