Which would you rather be famous for?

Hey there. Just wondering...

Would you rather be known for debunking or for finding an authentic photo/video of a UFO?

I would say authentic photo.....

But then again.... first contact would be nice.

I debunk ufo stories on a daily basis..It would be nice to be recognized for finding absolute 100% no denying truth of the existence of ET life.

Finding 100% proof of aliens. It's not really that hard to debunk most UFO vids, whereas it is very hard to find authentic proof that they exist

reply to post by Kali74


Neither, if you proved they exist you'd probably get killed. I wouldn't mind knowing for sure but the fame part you can keep.

An "authentic photo" would seem to imply a photo offering proof and i don't think there is one . Although not a debunker i require much more , and i saw not a ufo , but a flying saucer that i recounted in my introduction . Like everyone , i've seen what i believe are authentic photos , but authentic what ?

I'm glad the debunkers do what they do, keep us in check and prevent us from believing anything and everything we see out there, especially in this age where fantastic CGI is slapped together by amateurs in mere minutes.

With that said... Of course I'd love to contribute something authentic. ;-D

I want to be this version of Zefram Cochrane ...
... is that wrong?

I'd want to find 100% proof, of course! The person who does find that crucial piece of evidence will have their name among the most hallowed of science!

Who needs fame anyways? I would show a 100% proof to the world but i won´t do it for money or fame. There are far more important things in life as such things.