It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The proposals would also force all gun buyers to pass a background check, even if they make their purchases at gun shows, which are currently exempt.
"These common sense reforms would help us protect innocent citizens
"These common sense reforms would help us protect innocent citizens without taking away any rights from law-abiding gun owners," Read more: www.dnainfo.com...
Bloomberg, a long-time advocate against illegal guns
Last month, the mayor unveiled video footage of undercover agents easily purchasing guns at an Arizona gun show after telling sellers that they likely would not have been able to pass a background check had they been required to.
"If we’ve learned anything in the past two months it’s that we have to do a better job of making sure people who are not supposed to have guns don’t have them,
"Those who cannot responsibly own a gun shouldn’t have access to a gun. It’s that simple," he said.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
"It’s not bad politics to save people’s lives," Bloomberg said.
Originally posted by filosophia
www.dnainfo.com...
This looks a day old but I didn't see it posted up here. The trial is not even over yet and they are urging legislation as a result of the Tucson, shooting. We should at least wait for the trial to be over before declaring new legislation.
Originally posted by Aliensdoexist
Originally posted by filosophia
www.dnainfo.com...
This looks a day old but I didn't see it posted up here. The trial is not even over yet and they are urging legislation as a result of the Tucson, shooting. We should at least wait for the trial to be over before declaring new legislation.
Yeah I'm with you on that lets wait till the trial is over. I'm a gun owner and so laws that infringe on our 2nd Amendment Rights are always a touchy subject. I do agree that something more should be done to insure that people that shouldn't own a gun cannot get one, but any new laws on gun control needs to be real specific and not something that covers a broad spectrum and basically anyone could be found guilty. If they say any mental illness they need to specify which types of mental illnesses because there are literally hundreds of different mental illnesses that people have that doesn't make them wanna go out and shoot up a whole town (example: someone with "Obsessive Compulsive Disorder", its a mental illness that can be anything from washing your hands exactly 100 times a day to having to take an even amount of steps everywhere you walk because you fear odd numbers). Illnesses like that should not be in that mix its usually just some phobia like fear of spiders that gets more extreme as time goes on but is harmless to everyone, heck if you fear spiders then you also have a mental illness therefore should not own a firearm, you see it just needs to be specific.
Heck you can be a Police Officer and have Obsessive Compulsive Dissorder and thats ok but you cannot buy your own personal gun, but its ok for your department to provide you with one and protect and serve the population with that gun while your on duty. This is why any law that passes must be specific on what mental illnesses are to be enforced.
Originally posted by filosophia
The second amendment is very clear that all people have a right to own guns. So if someone is convicted of a crime they are now not allowed to protect themselves?