It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zappafan1
REPLY: Yeah........ let everything be free, and the hell with any time, effort or work that went into it.
And, you had to bring the energy companies into this? OT but pertinent to your post: As an example, Walmart makes about 4 cents on each dollar they invest.
Major energy companies make about 8 cents for every dollar they invest. That sound like a lot to you?
They make big bucks because they sell a lot of their product. Get a grip.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
You know, I love that nobody is pointing out that this thread basically got 200+ flags for buzzwords in the title. There's no substance and there's a clear attempt at profiteering on the same buzzwords that generate huge flag counts.
This thread is empty. There's no substance in it, just like every other claim of free energy. I'm not going to say Tesla wasn't a brilliant man, his inventions alone speak to that brilliant, but he wasn't necessarily right about everything. And the idea of free energy? Well, I've yet to see anyone do any sort of equation that backs up the claim, which is very odd considering how easy it should be if there's an actual invention that can produce free energy.
Originally posted by Pilgrum
Doesn't the fact that there's 'a ton of info out there' suggest the inverse of the claim that it's being suppressed?
Quite the opposite of suppression - we're flooded with claims of free energy achievements but none actually deliver the goods.
The corporations making a fortune from energy production would pounce on any real free (or even simply more efficient) energy production technology so they could make even more millions from largescale implementation of it with efficiencies of scale only dreamed of by backyard inventors.
There's also the prestige of bringing clean energy to market which does wonders for their public image.
If it works they won't put it under wraps but, instead, exploit the heck out of it for all it's worth.
An exception, as mentioned in a previous post, would be technology that's capable of being weaponised IE could be used against you instead of for you.
Originally posted by mbkennel
From what I understand of Tesla, he didn't know very much anything about quantum mechanics or relativity--his physics knowledge stopped evolving before Bohr and Heisenberg.
As far as I can tell he wasn't that much compared to say Enrico Fermi.
What's stopping it?
There are plenty of utilities who don't care where the joules come from as long as they don't get in trouble with regulators---their business is collecting bills every month.
And large industrialists like GE and Siemens would be very very very happy manufacturing the magic Tesla Free Energy Vortex coils and whatnot and selling maintenance contracts and liability insurance on them. It would be VERY profitable.
The US DoD has a strong interest in any kind of 'off grid' generation as supply & power of remote operating bases (think Afghanistan) is a major logistical problem.
I think that there isn't any magic free energy devices because the laws of physics don't let them happen, as depressing as it is.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
reply to post by Longy4eva
Although tesla was a genius, his free energy and flying devices allegedly built never saw the light of the day
nor did they come into the market
Originally posted by leaualorin
reply to post by Agarta
oh come on...
DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'VE POSTED?
DID YOU EVER TRIED TO MAKE ONE OF THESE DEVICES?
W T F are you all posting something you don't know what you are talking about?!
Well let me tell you one thing:
Taking just one invention : sending energy through the ionosphere ANYWERE IN THE WORLD AT NO COST FOR THE RECEIVER AND WITH NO ELECTRICAL WIRES MIGHT JUST BE THE END OF HUMANITY!
That curent through the ionosphere will disturb the electric charge that the human body NATURALLY HAS!
That can be translated in :
a lot of affection WILL SURELY OCCURE IN THE HUMAN BODY AS A RESULT :
1.decrease immunity
2.hormonale imbalances
3.nausea and dizziness
4.hypertension
5.Chronic Fatigue
6.tumors
7.leukemia
8.liver cancer
9.colon cancer
10.kidney cancer
11.Breast cancer
12.Skin cancer
13.brain tumors
14.endocrine tumors
15.Allergies
16.convulsions
17.insomnia
18.cataracts
19.deaths at birth
20.depression
21.memory loss
22.suicidal
23.dysfunction in learning
AND MANY MORE!
So stop the BS with how "magnificent NIKOLA TESLA IS" BECAUSE YOU ARE WRONG!
This "advance" in humanity is actually a involution , and FROM MY POINT OF VIEW OUR LIVES SHOULD BE TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IS TODAY!
We should look a lot more into our spirituality and living in a natural way , NOT what we are doing today(destroying our bodies and soul!).
And if you don't believe me DO YOU SEARCH/"HOMEWORKS" and convince yourself what is what!
p.s. : from my point of view NIKOLA TESLA IS EVIL! He was tall , had a strange look , might as well be a reptilian desguised as human that brought a lot of VERY EVIL INVENTIONS to a bunch of ignorant humans!
Originally posted by Amaterasu
I suggest reading Tom Bearden's Gravitobiology and imagine if we infolded healing.
If the technology was in the open, all of Us, Humans on this planet, could easily be kept well. If we received this technology I would imagine Each Individual of Us would have to forgive and never choose bad motives. And you know, that choice becomes a lot easier if we eliminate the need for money - which requires the energy production of this technology. Catch 22?
I'm hoping a solution would be found.
We'll see.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by Amaterasu
I suggest reading Tom Bearden's Gravitobiology and imagine if we infolded healing.
If the technology was in the open, all of Us, Humans on this planet, could easily be kept well. If we received this technology I would imagine Each Individual of Us would have to forgive and never choose bad motives. And you know, that choice becomes a lot easier if we eliminate the need for money - which requires the energy production of this technology. Catch 22?
I'm hoping a solution would be found.
We'll see.
You mean tommy's hypothesus. I have nothing against him, but his ideas and going on and on about maxwell's quaternions or pointyng vectors and all the rest of his gravitobiology without a shred of experimental proof, ia a little bit whacky.
He would do well to get on and get is MEG to the market.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
You mean tommy's hypothesus. I have nothing against him, but his ideas and going on and on about maxwell's quaternions or pointyng vectors and all the rest of his gravitobiology without a shred of experimental proof, ia a little bit whacky.
He would do well to get on and get is MEG to the market.