Time For A New Military Sidearm, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 11-6-2011 @ 12:49 AM by deesul69
reply to post by granpabobby



I beleive the 9mm had more to do with capacity and the popularity of it with other NATO militaries, along with a flatter trajectory than the slow and heavy .45. It definitely has less recoil than the .45, but not by that much.

You must also realize that the 9mm NATO is loaded to a higher pressure than typical 9x19. I think it's equivalent to something between a +p and +p+ round. If you've ever fired a really hot 9mm or +p+ round, it doesn't feel very less powerful than a .45. The type of weapon you fire each from plays a part, of course.
edit on 11-6-2011 by deesul69 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israeli Company Has FAA Permission to Fly Drones in U.S. Airspace
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
Colt Commander, finally failed
  Posted 7 days ago with 5 member flags
Laser Firearms
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
US Army Launches Phase II of competition to replace M4
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Show us your bow
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags