It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TerribleTeam2
I understand completely where you are coming from OP. And I agree that yes, you have the constitutional right to bear arms. I won't disagree one bit. I have 2 questions for Americans on here, from an Aussie trying to understand your viewpoint about firearms (and no, I'm not trying to be patronizing in any way):-
Originally posted by TerribleTeam2
1. I see ALOT of Americans on here saying that they own firearms because they have the right to, as afforded them by the Constitution, which is fair enough. My first question is:- How many of you actually NEED said Firearms???
Originally posted by TerribleTeam2
2. Leading on from question 1, I also see that alot of Americans say that they need Firearms for protection. Fair enough again. Question 2 is this:- How many of you have actually NEEDED to use said Firearm for self defence???
Originally posted by TerribleTeam2
To me, if you don't need them, but have one, it's simply because of fear. Fear of being hurt. Fear of being killed (hell, who doesn't have fear like that at some point?), just a basic fear.
I sincerely hope I haven't offended anyone by asking these questions, and making the comments I have. As I said, I just wanna try and get a better perspective of things
My problem is with the more powerful weapons/ammo and the idea that guns should be permitted everywhere at all times.
Guns are fun to shoot, no doubt, especially fully automatic guns! But my feeling is that fully automatic weapons should not be legally permitted except under controlled conditions e.g. shooting range. Your desire to carry high powered weapons for protection and entertainment is not a good enought reason for me.
I don't like the cloud of fear and anxiety created by weapons. I don't want to live my life in some kind of wild west nightmare. I don't feel safer knowing everyone around me is carrying a gun, I know some people do, I don't.
Aurora and Bodie clearly were not dens of criminal activity, and women residents of the towns were far safer than their counterparts are today in any American city. Nonetheless, when it came to men fighting men, Aurora and Bodie were unquestionably violent. [27] Men fought men with fists, knives, and guns, and they often fought to the death. They occasionally fought over women or mining property, or even politics. But mostly they (p.133) fought over who was the better man, real or imagined insults, and challenges to pecking order in the saloon. The men involved in the fights were willing—often very willing—participants.
regarding the ammo identification. I read somewhere that soon they will be able to give a specific nano sized identifiers for each box of bullets. This identifier cannot be destroyed and will be a part of the entire bullet including casings.
At the very least it would encourage gun owners to store the ammo carefully.
Originally posted by TerribleTeam22. Leading on from question 1, I also see that alot of Americans say that they need Firearms for protection. Fair enough again. Question 2 is this:- How many of you have actually NEEDED to use said Firearm for self defence???
Originally posted by liejunkie01
I myself cannot own a firearm. This is one of my most shameful(regretful) actions of not giving a damn when I was younger. Yes I am a felon(non violent) and therefor forever screwed up my abilities of ever owning a gun. I tell everybody even if you do not want a gun you need to get your FOID card. Do this to express the right that if you wanted to get a gun you have the constitutional right to do so. The more people that have their FOID card, the more numbers of votable citizens that politicians have to take into consideration before they introduce new legislation for gun control. Who wants to propose a bill that will surely get them elected out of office. It is a constitutonal right that I regretfully cannot express.edit on 20-1-2011 by liejunkie01 because: insert them
Originally posted by Seitler
reply to post by purplemer
Nukes ARE banned. Search the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. (I looked and could not see if there was specifics regarding individual people possessing nuclear weapons... only city-states[nations])
I wonder if I farted and held you head under the covers and then you died of methane inhalation, should we make a ban against farting in enclosed spaces? Common, did you real bring nukes into this? That is laughable!
Originally posted by hillynilly
Then why make a thead about you so tired of hearing
people protest about gun ownership in America.
Do you not think you will just hear more.
Or is this a troll method. Stupid girl, makes sense.
Someone with that name would not understand the constution.
Would not understand
NO ONE WILL TAKE OUR GUNS.
Does not understand what they are talking about.
I'm going to protest righ now,
MY GUNS STAY IN MY HANDS GET IT!!!edit on 21-1-2011 by hillynilly because: (no reason given)[/quote
It is sort of funny that all the revolutionaries fiercely, mercilessly and senselessly defending even crazy peoples "right" to own a gun are new members?
Can you say..."pro-NRA group sent out en mass with a blogging agenda?"
Protecting innocent Americans caught in the crossfire should be issue number one.
The Constitution doesn't protect a murderers right to own a gun.
However, the NRA does.
The Constitution doesn't protect a murderers right to own a gun.
However, the NRA does.
Under federal law supported by the National Rifle Association, the use of a firearm in a violent or drug-trafficking crime is punishable by a mandatory prison sentence of up to 20 years. A second conviction, if the firearm is a machine gun or is equipped with a silencer, brings life imprisonment without release. Violating firearms laws should lead to very real punishment for violent criminals, but the laws first must be enforced.
Since the Supreme Court only recently determined gun ownership was a "right" granted by our Constitution to every American I don't know how you can be "tired" already.
It has always been vague what the framers intended and who exactly was meant as part of a "militia."
In the Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, 97th Congress, Second Session (February 1982), a bipartisan subcommittee (consisting of 3 Republicans and 2 Democrats) of the United States Senate investigated the Second Amendment and reported its findings. The report stated:
The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner.[1]
Source
edit on 24-1-2011 by MikeNice81 because: (no reason given)