It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by defiler
Can someone please give me a link of the page that contains the original photos. I will see if they have a signature that matches some of the photo editing software.
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Originally posted by defiler
Can someone please give me a link of the page that contains the original photos. I will see if they have a signature that matches some of the photo editing software.
This has been done many times already by various members.
Originally posted by UKWO1Phot
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Originally posted by defiler
Can someone please give me a link of the page that contains the original photos. I will see if they have a signature that matches some of the photo editing software.
This has been done many times already by various members.
The originals the OP uploaded are unavailable at the host site.
The 1 you posted is the only original available and that image can't be downloaded from the link you posted.
So if anyone has the originals zip them up and post a link..
Originally posted by defiler
Hmm ...
The compression signature on the image dscf0979r.jpg. Looks like this image has been edited.
EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality
The following IJG-based editors also match this signature:
SW :[GIMP ] [092 ]
SW :[IrfanView ] [092 ]
SW :[idImager ] [092 ]
SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [092 ]
SW :[NeatImage ] [092 ]
SW :[Paint.NET ] [092 ]
SW :[Photomatix ] [092 ]
SW :[XnView ] [092 ]
And the same with the image c23ed8783102.jpg
The following IJG-based editors also match this signature:
SW :[GIMP ] [080 ]
SW :[IrfanView ] [080 ]
SW :[idImager ] [080 ]
SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [080 ]
SW :[NeatImage ] [080 ]
SW :[Paint.NET ] [080 ]
SW :[Photomatix ] [080 ]
SW :[XnView ] [080 ]
edit on 12/1/11 by defiler because: I found them
Originally posted by defiler
Hmm ...
The compression signature on the image dscf0979r.jpg. Looks like this image has been edited.
EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality
The following IJG-based editors also match this signature:
SW :[GIMP ] [092 ]
SW :[IrfanView ] [092 ]
SW :[idImager ] [092 ]
SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [092 ]
SW :[NeatImage ] [092 ]
SW :[Paint.NET ] [092 ]
SW :[Photomatix ] [092 ]
SW :[XnView ] [092 ]
And the same with the image c23ed8783102.jpg
The following IJG-based editors also match this signature:
SW :[GIMP ] [080 ]
SW :[IrfanView ] [080 ]
SW :[idImager ] [080 ]
SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [080 ]
SW :[NeatImage ] [080 ]
SW :[Paint.NET ] [080 ]
SW :[Photomatix ] [080 ]
SW :[XnView ] [080 ]
edit on 12/1/11 by defiler because: I found them
One of the latest features in JPEGsnoop is an internal database that compares an image against a large number of compression signatures. JPEGsnoop reports what digital camera or software was likely used to generate the image. This is extremely useful in determining whether or not a photo has been edited / tampered in any way.