It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

No Lawsuits proves their WAS a Conspiracy!

page: 1
7

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 28 2010 @ 03:15 PM
link   
How come all these people who have made videos and written books and articles about 9/11 being an inside job and naming specific people and agencies as being complicit to some degree in the 9/11 attacks haven't been sued for slander and their accusations destroyed in court?

Because they are telling the truth! That's why! Because the perpetrators know that they can't risk the evidence being debated in court without being exposed and punished. They know they can't rig and hinder any longer as they did with the Commission because too many people are aware and awake now and too many eyes will be watching their manipulation.

They are desperate to just try and ride out the storm of 9/11 truth, hoping it will eventually die down and go away. They are hiding from it! They don't WANT to increase exposure to their crimes by confronting and challenging the 9/11 truth movement directly. They know they would lose. They know even their lap dog mainstream media would be forced to cover it. They know their crimes would be uncovered before all Americans. They know that to do this would give the truth movement a public platform and a voice to reach even more Americans.

In fact, they would do everything in their power - which in regards to the legal system, is considerable - to stop such issues coming to court.

Their refusal to use the legal process to shut down their accusers - who could not have been more explicit and outspoken - PROVES the conspiracy to be true!

See, there's always another way of looking at things.

edit on 28-12-2010 by Malcram because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 28 2010 @ 05:21 PM
link   
Sibel Edmonds has the foremost 9/11 case against the government and she is repeatedly stonewalled.

Her first case against the government was thrown out by John Ashcroft himself citing states secrets privileges.

And if anyone wants more information on that, they have this thing called Google...



posted on Dec, 29 2010 @ 12:23 PM
link   
The OP is magnificently stated and should be obvious to everyone, but for some reason a few idiots just can't grasp the concepts involved with not believing something just because an authority figure told you it was so. S & F for you my friend.



new topics
 
7

log in

join