It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maslo
Another thing to consider is that from a moral or legal standpoint the existence of law is not dependent on our ability enforce it in practice. It is wrong to endanger people by driving drunk, irregardless of our ability to keep drunk people from driving and thus enforce this law. Our inability to catch most of drunk drivers is not a reason to legalize drunk driving.
So even if we suppose that drunk driving laws do not prevent drunk driving related deaths in practice (for the sake of argument), it would not be a reason to legalize drunk driving.
At a cost of 20 billion dollars a year, society can not afford to enforce yet another victimless law.
DUI laws combined with the "war on drugs" are pissing 10% of the value of the entire M1 money supply down the gutter every year for the prevention of 400 deaths.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by DrChuck
So you agree with the OP that laws cannot prevent and can only punish?
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by Puresilence
I find your response to me rude.
Given the choice of having myself or someone I love hit and killed by a drunk driver, I would perfer to have a law in place preventing or discouraging it. You've read the posts on this thread. If one of those people had not been killed, then the law is worth it.
Given a choice of having my plane flown into a building and killing thousands of people and burning to death, or undergoing an unpleasant exam, I would choose the latter. If another 911 could be averted, then the procedures are worth it.
They might not be the best plans, but for now, they are the only sources of semi-protection we have.
I happen to value human life, and these laws were put into place to demonstrate such value.
Now please have your little hissy fit on someone else.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Punishing someone that hasn’t hurt anyone or damaged anyone else’s property by their actions is wrong.
Originally posted by Puresilence
Maybe we should be locked in our homes because it's dangerous out there. "Better safe than sorry!"
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Puresilence
Maybe we should be locked in our homes because it's dangerous out there. "Better safe than sorry!"
Let me ask you, do you think people shouldn't bother with safe sex? It's really more fun bareback!
So, what do you say?
Originally posted by BillfromCovina
The law against drunk driving is basically an acceptance of a failure to solve the problem. Instead of using technology and other methods that would be more effective, a law is created. This law creates a whole new industry that feeds on itself. The problem can never go away because of the various industries that depend on it. The laws and propaganda will only get worse. The people that depend on it now do not want it to go away. Law enforcement, the justice system, and government will not allow this problem to be eliminated.