It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The 2010 meteorological year, which ended on 30 November, was the warmest in NASA's 130-year record, data posted by the agency today shows. Over the oceans as well as on land, the average global temperature for the 12-month period that began last December was 14.65˚C. That's 0.65˚C warmer than the average global temperature between 1951 and 1980, a period scientists use as a basis for comparison.
Originally posted by MMPI2
nasa disclosed "temperature data" a while back that, if accurate, indicated that the water in lake superior would be like 650 degrees fairenheit.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by SaturnFX
Don't you think your/NASA thread title is a little missleading?
Last I heard ever does not equal 130 years...!!!!!!
130 is not even a blink in the life of earth..
Making assumptions based on 130 years of records is crazy...
I just wonder why they don't include other data that is known from ice samples etc to show the real story dating back 1.000's of years..
Anytime someone makes an claim based on a minute part of known data then you MUST question their agenda..edit on 11-12-2010 by backinblack because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
Ice cubes. Definitely Ice cubes. Global warming produces ice-age or ice-age-like events.
I'll wager 10 bars of gold pressed latinum.
My thread title is actually the articles title...got a problem with it, call NASA
And 130 years is significant enough time to notice trends.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by MMPI2
nasa disclosed "temperature data" a while back that, if accurate, indicated that the water in lake superior would be like 650 degrees fairenheit.
Care to give a source?
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by SaturnFX
My thread title is actually the articles title...got a problem with it, call NASA
And 130 years is significant enough time to notice trends.
Yes I saw it was the article title and why I mentioned NASA...
So 130 years is enough to see a trend you say?
Are you saying then that that trend is for continued warming?
Haven't there been warmer periods in earths history?
Are you inferring it's natural or Man Made??
I'm just unsure where this thread is aimed..
WikiLeaks And Claim Of Warmest Year On Record, Expose Climate Criminality
Question; How and why can a year be claimed as the warmest on record two months before it is over? Answer: To help participants in Cancun Climate Conference desperate because the public don’t believe, funding and power is being lost, as their deceptions are exposed.
Most believe 2010 is the warmest year ever, which is what government weather agencies, proponents of anthropogenic global warming and their supporters want. What is actually claimed is that 2010 is on the way to being the warmest on record, but they know media headlines will distort and USA Today along with others obliges with; 2010: Warmest year on record
Distortion and deception became necessary to support the collapsing exploitation of climate science (Figure 1) faced by all enjoying the warmth of Cancun Mexico while attending the Conference of the Parties (COP) 16 climate meeting. The paradox of record cold wasn’t lost on the public.
Originally posted by MMPI2
nasa disclosed "temperature data" a while back that, if accurate, indicated that the water in lake superior would be like 650 degrees fairenheit.
nasa's data is not solid, and has been corrupted by the fake "global warming" scammers.
Originally posted by MMPI2
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by MMPI2
nasa disclosed "temperature data" a while back that, if accurate, indicated that the water in lake superior would be like 650 degrees fairenheit.
Care to give a source?
sure...here you go:
climatechangedispatch.com...
Before we continue, please list your qualifications...because until you prove to me qualifications equal to those of nasa's argument, then your argument may just end up being the brainwashing a certain political party is trying to push to favor corporate interests over the health of the planet.
So ya..lets here it...whats your qualifications.
I am not saying jack, I am however listening to what -they- are saying, and if you don't know what they are saying, well, why are you even commenting in this thread?
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by MMPI2
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by MMPI2
nasa disclosed "temperature data" a while back that, if accurate, indicated that the water in lake superior would be like 650 degrees fairenheit.
Care to give a source?
sure...here you go:
climatechangedispatch.com...
Really?
Your going with some random dude with a godaddy account over nasa..funny.
are you being serious btw?
man, ...PT Barnum was right.
there's one born every minute
Originally posted by MMPI2
you asked for a citation...i gave it. you immediately rejected it in a rather anti-intellectual manner.
did you even read the article? did you look at the graphs that were published by noaa and nasa, and were then deleted off of their websites?
yes, indeed. there is a sucker born every minute...especially those that buy into the global warming con.