posted on Dec, 9 2010 @ 11:47 AM
Ha, I just finished reading that Answer Man interview, almost surprised to see a thread on it.
Luke Scott sounds like a pretty all right guy. Makes you wonder if he surfs these boards.
The one thing that struck me as odd, I don't read interviews much, was the editor's diligent fact checking. I guess I haven't seen that ever
before. I don't see much reason to correct someone over a statement like DC having the highest crime rate in an interview like this. They let the
reader know that DC is only the 16th worst. Big woop huh? A case could be made that the highest concentration of supervillains ply their trade in that
town, lol. The other thing is, the BC. Why would they have to throw that into the article? I mean it looks pretty generic, mine looks nothing like
that, yours probably doesn't either. I thought that was supposed to be legal proof, but who signed off on it? Mine has like 7 signatures. Just seems
out of place for this kind of interview.
If there was anyone in the world who could have a document faked.... That's not really the point, but injecting that tidbit of 'proof' into an
interview/opinion piece is just creepy I guess. Well, Luke Scott obviously has his conspiracies mixed up, but he's still a good slugger and hopefully
he keeps his slugging % above .600 next year. Nothing to see here, move along, lol.