Ok this site now appears down so if its ok i was going to past some of intesting bits in...
I know you are not meant to copy and past but i cudnt think of what else to do under the circumstance. If a mod closes the thread then so be it...
In my eyes of the more intersting things WL have covered in the past are:
WikiLeaks reveals Pentagon journalist murder-coverup in Iraq / army airstrike video, 5 Apr 2010
WikiLeaks to release over half a million 9/11 text pager intercepts
Climatic Research Unit emails, data, models, 1996-2009
Microsoft COFEE (Computer Online Forensics Evidence Extractor) tool and documentation, Sep 2009
British National Party membership list and other information, 15 Apr 2009
These cover a large range of topics and not just the USA. IN reference to USA a WL spokeman said:
The final point to consider is Wikileaks' spokespeople's explicit statements about the purpose of the United States releases, and their attitude
towards the United States. Wikileaks upholds founding values of the United States as inspirational to its own project, and celebrates the freedom of
speech tradition consistently defended by the United States Supreme Court....
Exracts from the now AWOL page....
The Falsehood:
While claiming to be an organization interested in global justice, Wikileaks is really a virulently anti-American organization.
The Explanation:
This falsehood is quite straightforward. Its propagation in the media, especially the U.S. media, has vastly increased since Sunday 29 November, on
which date Wikileaks began its Cablegate releases. The falsehood normally relies on a group of subsidiary falsehoods, such as the idea that "Wikileaks
won't release information on China or Russia."
The Source:
This falsehood is hard to trace to an original source, since its use has been so frequent. One can only point to prominent sources, and look at these
as representative of, or causative of, the falsehood's popularity. In a now very famous post on her Facebook page, former governor of Alaska, and
former vice presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, wrote a single short sentence which managed to include two frequent falsehoods in only ten words:
He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands.
The substance of the allegation, though, consists in the belief that Wikileaks publishes no material on other entities. This argument has been made in
the Telegraph, by George Grant.
If Assange is genuinely committed to shining light into the darkness, and exposing real corruption and human rights abuse, we must ask ourselves,
where are the ‘Chinese Embassy Cables’? What has become of the ‘Iran Files’? Whither the ‘Chechnya War Logs’?...
The ... answer to this question could just as easily be, however, that Assange is not really all that interested in exposing corruption and human
rights abuse at all, rather his objective is to embarrass and weaken the US and its Western allies because he hates them for what they are and what
they stand for.
Following on from arguments like this, one finds the question "Why doesn't Wikileaks focus on other countries?" repeated all over the internet, with
little concern over the falsehood of its premise, and little worry that it funds an inference to a new falsehood.
The Truth:
There are many ways to approach debunking this falsehood. One thing it is important to say from the outset: there is little reason to rely on
allegation and rumour from American punditry, when there is already a thorough and articulate defense of Wikileaks' activities by its various
spokespersons. We advise that even a cursory attempt to engage with Wikileaks' now plentiful literature on its own activities will comprehensively
answer many of the worries raised by media personalities with a proven history of rhetorical mendacity. At the very least, criticisms of Wikileaks
ought to address Wikileaks strong and intellectually penetrating arguments, and there has been very little attempt to do that by American news
networks and mainstream publications.
* 1. How material finds its way to Wikileaks
A prominent misconception about Wikileaks is that it proactively acquires its material, and therefore must have deliberately sought material on the
United States. This is false. The first thing that must be understood is that Wikileaks does not proactively acquire its leaks. Assange on the
matter:
We’re totally source dependent. We get what we get. As our profile rises in a certain area, we get more in a particular area. People say, why
don’t you release more leaks from the Taliban. So I say hey, help us, tell more Taliban dissidents about us.
All of Wikileaks' material has been sent to it, by insider whistleblowers, who felt that it was necessary to disclose something. Wikileaks can
therefore only choose what to publish from what has already been submitted to it.
Before its old website was taken down, (a newer version can be consulted here) Wikileaks publicly stated it would only accept leaks of the following
sort:
1. Classified, censored, or otherwise restricted material of political, diplomatic, historical or ethical significance.
2. WikiLeaks does not accept rumour, opinion, or other kinds of first hand reporting or material that is already publicly available.
3. Areas of documents leaked thus far have covered government, trade, corporate, war, killings, torture, detention, suppression of free speech
and free press, diplomacy, spying, counter-intelligence, ecology, climate, nature, sciences, corruption, finances, taxes, trading, censorship and
internet filtering, cults, religious organizations, abuse, violence, violations.
Wikileaks agrees, therefore, to accept material that concerns more than just the United States. The organization concerns itself with a broad range of
materials.
On this point, it is also worth observing that though it may have changed policy as it grew, in the past, Wikileaks proclaimed a predominant interest
in 'Third World' leaks.
Our primary interest is in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we also expect
to be of assistance to people of all regions who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and corporations. We aim for maximum political
impact.
* 2. What Wikileaks has published in the past.
Another common assumption is that Wikileaks has only published material on the United States. Given the availability of Wikileaks' previous
publications, this is perhaps understandable. Nevertheless, it is false. Wikileaks' publishing history in fact bears out its stated remit of pursuing
materials of signifiance to the historical record. Because of DDOS attacks and corporate webhost divestment from Wikileaks, the original MediaWiki
site from which Wikileaks draws its name is no longer available (originally at __._). A copy of that site still exists in Google Cache.
There, a vast number of leaks is visible, relevant to a wide variety of corporate and national entities. A selection includes:
* CIA Red Cell Memorandum on United States "exporting terrorism", 2 Feb 2010
* ABC Foreign Correspondent video report on Thailand, 13 April 2010
* Loveparade 2010 Duisburg planning documents, 2007-2010
* WikiLeaks reveals Pentagon journalist murder-coverup in Iraq / army airstrike video, 5 Apr 2010
* U.S. Embassy profiles on Icelandic PM, Foreign Minister, Ambassador, 29 Mar 2010
* CIA report into shoring up Afghan war support in Western Europe, 11 Mar 2010
* U.S. Intelligence planned to destroy WikiLeaks, 18 Mar 2008
* Over 40 billion euro in 28167 claims made aganst the Kaupthing Bank, 23 Jan 2010
* BBC High Court Defence against Trafigura libel suit, 11 Sep 2009
* Icelandic Icesave offer to UK-NL, 25 Feb 2010
* Cryptome.org takedown: Microsoft Global Criminal Compliance Handbook, 24 Feb 2010
* Classified cable from US Embassy Reykjavik on Icesave dated 13 Jan 2010
Tiger Woods UK media gag order, 10 Dec 2009
* Big Pharma inside the WHO: confidential analysis of unreleased WHO Expert Working Group draft reports, 8 Dec 2009
* Draft Copenhagen climate change agreement, 8 Dec 2009
* US Transportation Security Administration: Screening Procedures Standard Operating Procedures, 1 May 2008
* Yahoo compliance guide for law enforcement, 23 Dec 2008
* Microsoft COFEE (Computer Online Forensics Evidence Extractor) tool and documentation, Sep 2009
* Rechtsanwalt Solmecke unzensierter Blogeintrag zu Abmahnanwaelten und deren Geschaeftspraktiken, 25 Nov 2009
* WikiLeaks to release over half a million 9/11 text pager intercepts
* Toll Collect Betreibervertrag, 5 Jun 2002
* Toll Collect AGES International Kooperationsvertrag, 20 Sep 2002
* Toll Collect Sachverstaendigenvertrag Dr.-Ing. Schwerhoff, 23 May 2003
* Rechtsanwalt Seibert droht WikiLeaks mit Strafverfolgung wegen Ratiopharm Ermittlungsakte, 20 Nov 2009
* Climatic Research Unit emails, data, models, 1996-2009
* Davenport Lyons and DigiProtect Actionpoints for filesharers, 14 Jan 2009
* Davenport Lyons and Kornmeier Monetary and Working Correspondence, 19 Mar 2008
* Ermittlungsakte Landespolizeidirektion Tuebingen gegen die Ratiopharm GmbH wegen Untreue und Bestechung, 12 Mar 2008
* Controversial holocaust historian David Irving emails, Nov 2009
* EU draft council decision on sharing of banking data with the US and restructuring of SWIFT, 10 Nov 2009
* Suppressed video of Thai Crown Prince and Princess at decadent dog party
* Spring Design Inc lawsuit against Barnes and Nobles, Nov 2009
* Removed paper on Internet censorship trails in Australia, NZ, UK with NetClean Whitebox, 2009
* British National Party membership list and other information, 15 Apr 2009
* UK MoD Manual of Security Volumes 1, 2 and 3 Issue 2, JSP-440, RESTRICTED, 2389 pages, 2001
* Times TOP50 work places for women, due to appear on 7 Oct 2009, looks like a fraud, internal docs, Aurora, 2007-2009
* UK Ministry of Defence continually monitors WikiLeaks: eight reports into classified UK leaks, 29 Sep 2009
* Corruption in Norway, Ghana or both? Statoil v. BioFuel and the Kroll Inc. private intelligence report, Feb 2009
* FDP Arguliner zu Aenderungen beim Kuendigungsschutz, 8 Sep 2009
Lycos Deutschland Suchmaschinen Zensurliste
* Product placement hell: Cisco "bribes" 24, CSI, House, Heroes, the Office, and more
* Yale pharmacology chair Joseph Schlessinger suppressed site exposing sexual, financial misconduct, 14 Sep 2009
* 3. How Wikileaks prioritizes its publications
The third point to consider is that 2010 has been a year of "megaleaks" with an emphasis on the United States. Why is this, if Wikileaks is not
deliberately targeting the United States?
In an interview with Andy Greenberg, for Forbes, Julian Assange explains this quite reasonably.
Greenberg:To start, is it true you’re sitting on trove of unpublished documents?
Assange:Sure. That’s usually the case. As we’ve gotten more successful, there’s a gap between the speed of our publishing pipeline and the
speed of our receiving submissions pipeline. Our pipeline of leaks has been increasing exponentially as our profile rises, and our ability to publish
is increasing linearly...
Greenberg:You’ve been focused on the U.S. military mostly in the last year. Does that mean you have private sector-focused leaks in the
works?
Assange:Yes. If you think about it, we have a publishing pipeline that’s increasing linearly, and an exponential number of leaks, so we’re in
a position where we have to prioritize our resources so that the biggest impact stuff gets released first.
Greenberg:When will WikiLeaks return to its older model of more frequent leaks of smaller amounts of material?
Assange:If you look at the average number of documents we’re releasing, we’re vastly exceeding what we did last year. These are huge datasets.
So it’s actually very efficient for us to do that. If you look at the number of packages, the number of packages has decreased. But if you look at
the average number of documents, that’s tremendously increased.
Greenberg:So will you return to the model of higher number of targets and sources?
Assange:Yes. Though I do actually think…[pauses] These big package releases. There should be a cute name for them.
Greenberg:Megaleaks?
Assange:Megaleaks. That’s good. These megaleaks…They’re an important phenomenon, and they’re only going to increase. When there’s a
tremendous dataset, covering a whole period of history or affecting a whole group of people, that’s worth specializing on and doing a unique
production for each one, which is what we’ve done.
* 4. Wikileaks' Publicly-stated Intentions
The final point to consider is Wikileaks' spokespeople's explicit statements about the purpose of the United States releases, and their attitude
towards the United States. Wikileaks upholds founding values of the United States as inspirational to its own project, and celebrates the freedom of
speech tradition consistently defended by the United States Supreme Court:
wlcentral.org
(visit the link for the full news article)
edit on 5-12-2010 by purplemer because: (no reason given)