First of all, WikiLeaks isn't just about cables. It's just that is what they got this time. Secondly, the cables are all from SIPRNET, a somewhat
secret-like network that something like 3 to 5 million people have access to (depending on your source.) I don't see how you can claim anything that
millions of people have access to "secret." Thirdly, most all the cables that were leaked were not even rated with the "Secret" classification scheme,
though some were. Fourthly, a "Secret" classification is not all that secret. There is only one classification below "Secret," and that is
"Confidential," which no one uses any more. In other words, "Secret" is the new "Confidential."
Bottom line is that these cables, though a bit embarrassing in places where people spoke candidly, don't really show much. Although WikiLeaks has
created quite a stir on places like ATS, more
sober analysts such as
Stratfor don't think it's that big a deal. WikiLeaks would certainly like to get its hands on something truly sensational, but so far that
hasn't happened. and if it did, the consequences would be much more severe. If anyone ever leaks Top Secret documents, they'd better be able to cover
their tracks a lot better than Manning did. Manning is a small potatoes guy who managed to leak a lot of small potatoes documents.
The real "tell" here is that all the governments involved are following legal procedures. If this were truly big, that wouldn't be done. It would just
be taken care of discretely. Those who thiink the "CIA did it" with Julian's condom legal troubles ought to read this:
The wildly promiscuous lifestyle of WikiLeaks boss Julian Assange: Look away now Jemima as our report reveals the sordid truth from our
friends at the Daily Mail.
edit on 12/20/2010 by schuyler because: spelling, as usual