WIKILEAKS: Prediction - No "history changing" cables will be released !, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 4-12-2010 @ 11:41 PM by bussoboy
reply to post by afoolbyanyothername



Lets say that turns out to be true, so why all attempts by the powerfull to try and stop you and me from reading what they release?

Why is some bloke in the US (see ATS thread on this or youtube video) urging another person (Obama) to enage in terrerrorism by saying that Obama should take out a contract on Julien Assange? Exactly what has Assnage been convicted of in a court of law that makes him a sutable candidate for assassination??

Please correct me if wrong but as I understand US law on terrorism is that any person who encourages another person to carry out acts of terrorism is punnishable by a goal term. Is that not correct? If this is correct who has this bloke not been arrested, but thats another matter.

If all the informtion Wikileaks releases turns out to be nothing of any conequence all it proves is that the reason for trying to silence Wikileaks and those behind it, is that it is nothing more than trying to put a rival who threathens the control and power the TPTB currently have, out of busienss, dont you agree?

cheers



Where


reply posted on 5-12-2010 @ 12:04 PM by andy1033
reply to post by afoolbyanyothername



I said this before hand and i never bothered with them last time.

What can they really bring out?


reply posted on 20-12-2010 @ 04:54 PM by schuyler
First of all, WikiLeaks isn't just about cables. It's just that is what they got this time. Secondly, the cables are all from SIPRNET, a somewhat secret-like network that something like 3 to 5 million people have access to (depending on your source.) I don't see how you can claim anything that millions of people have access to "secret." Thirdly, most all the cables that were leaked were not even rated with the "Secret" classification scheme, though some were. Fourthly, a "Secret" classification is not all that secret. There is only one classification below "Secret," and that is "Confidential," which no one uses any more. In other words, "Secret" is the new "Confidential."

Bottom line is that these cables, though a bit embarrassing in places where people spoke candidly, don't really show much. Although WikiLeaks has created quite a stir on places like ATS, more
sober analysts such as Stratfor don't think it's that big a deal. WikiLeaks would certainly like to get its hands on something truly sensational, but so far that hasn't happened. and if it did, the consequences would be much more severe. If anyone ever leaks Top Secret documents, they'd better be able to cover their tracks a lot better than Manning did. Manning is a small potatoes guy who managed to leak a lot of small potatoes documents.

The real "tell" here is that all the governments involved are following legal procedures. If this were truly big, that wouldn't be done. It would just be taken care of discretely. Those who thiink the "CIA did it" with Julian's condom legal troubles ought to read this: The wildly promiscuous lifestyle of WikiLeaks boss Julian Assange: Look away now Jemima as our report reveals the sordid truth from our friends at the Daily Mail.
edit on 12/20/2010 by schuyler because: spelling, as usual



reply posted on 20-12-2010 @ 05:22 PM by HattoriHanzou
reply to post by afoolbyanyothername



Everything that could upset the status quo has been edited into uselessness. Assange is part of the system, and the purpose of the cables is simply to create a magic show.

Wikileaks needs to release all the cables, unredacted, in a giant torrent if they want to maintain any credibility at all at this point. Releasing a few heavily edited cables per day that barely shine any light on the situation is just a joke and anybody in the know can see that. This move was made to impress 19 year old kids, not people who think about diplomacy and long term national strategy. I also believe it was made to embarrass the conservatives, as you might notice that cables painting Clinton as an ass (such as Balkan related materials, which could no doubt be juicy as heck) are strangely absent.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^