It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Hidden behind the save-the-world rhetoric of the global climate change negotiations lies the mucky realpolitik: money and threats buy political support; spying and cyberwarfare are used to seek out leverage.
The US diplomatic cables reveal how the US seeks dirt on nations opposed to its approach to tackling global warming; how financial and other aid is used by countries to gain political backing; how distrust, broken promises and creative accounting dog negotiations.... continues in the lin
.
When leaked e-mails exposed the global warming hype to be a concocted fraud, the "newspaper of record" was in high dudgeon. When stolen classified information appears on its front page, that's another story.
When Climate-gate broke, and e-mails revealed that scientists worldwide were deleting and doctoring data to "hide the decline" in global temperatures and engaging in an organized campaign to discredit climate-change skeptics and deny them publication in scientific journals, the Times pompously declined to print any of them or even give them credence.
This is not the first time the Times has helped sell out America. In a June 23, 2006, story by Eric Lichtblau and James Risen headlined "Bank Data Sifted In Secret By U.S. To Block Terror," the Times helped expose an effective tool used to "follow the money" and unravel and disable the terrorist financing network.
I'm not a climate change denier, but I am very doubtful that mankind has anything to do with it. While pollution and deforestation will have an impact on planetary climate, it is miniscule, and the Earth's regular cycle over thousands and hundreds of thousands of years show global warming / cooling cycles ongoing.
President Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren is worried about global warming. Having noticed that there hasn’t actually been any global warming since 1998, he feels it ought to be called “global climate disruption” instead. That way whether it gets warmer or colder, wetter or drier, less climatically eventful or more climatically eventful, the result will be the same: it can all be put down to “global climate disruption.”
Computer hackers find 120Mb of emails, documents, computer code and models from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, written between 1996 and 2009. The documents show that global warming is not real and how scientists are trying to distort and FAKE the data to keep the global warming fraud going
The US diplomatic cables reveal how the US seeks dirt on nations opposed to its approach to tackling global warming;
Negotiating a climate treaty is a high-stakes game, not just because of the danger warming poses to civilisation but also because re-engineering the global economy to a low-carbon model will see the flow of billions of dollars redirected.
Originally posted by RUSSO
Global warming IS a hoax. NOT MADE BY HUMANS.
Embassy dispatches show America used spying, threats and promises of aid to get support for Copenhagen accord.
My favorite line from this :
(from Phil Jones on 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000):I've just completed Mike?s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from1961 for Keith's to hide the decline.Of course this is the reason we're calling it climate change and not global warming, since warming is very easily disproved when the temperatures decline.
Computer hackers find 120Mb of emails, documents, computer code and models from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, written between 1996 and 2009. The documents show that global warming is not real and how scientists are trying to distort and fake the data to keep the global warming fraud going
Global warming is a hoax. All about money, AGAIN.
www.guardian.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
edit on 3-12-2010 by RUSSO because: (no reason given)