Amazon.com Terminates Relationship With WikiLeaks, No Longer Hosts Whistle-Blower Website

Greetings,

It would seem to me that unless wikileaks had signed a confidentiality agreement that they are free to publish anything they want. There is no law that I know of that prohibits the dissemination of information, secret or not. Welcome to an open society. The government should know by now that if you don't want it public, don't write it.

Well..WL is now back on Swedish and European ground..Here they is protected by constotution and free of speech..

reply to post by OddTimeSignature


Or the illusion of? Lets see how long before something "changes".
2nd

reply to post by 1curious1


It's much easier to play you along for several months or years if they do it this way.

Plus, you are more likely to buy the book, the CD, and the DVD of the movie they'll put out later next spring to "tell their story."

In a word, it's "marketing." I'd be shocked if they weren't any good at it.

From the WSJ

Video