It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by peter_kandra
I'm not too familiar with dew weapons or particle beams. Several members did appear to make valid semi-scientific posts of why they don't feel that's the case here. Are these types of weapons invisible? I mean there were thousands of people at the scene, not to mention millions more watching it through various forms of media. People saw planes, yet no one claims to have seen any type of beam weapon. I thought the standing theory was controlled demolition and thermite?
Originally posted by s7ryk3r
I was pretty skeptical when I first heard about this too and thought it sounded ridiculous but then I came across this website:
This site brought into light some pretty strange things that occurred that day and the 1400 vehicles that were destroyed that day...
This site was also quite fascinating which actually describes how energy weapons may have been used:
Really at this point I am not trying to convince anyone how it happened, rather what we were told happened was very different from what the evidence suggests.
Many 9/11 conspiracists/revisionists/rejectionists/deniers support the theory of Judy Wood, since she is a mechanical engineer who happens to agree with their bogus hypothesis that "9/11 was an inside job." Wood claims that if the pancake Twin Towers collapse theory is true, then the Twin Towers would have had to completely collapse in 87.9 to 96.7 seconds. She creates an analogy between the floors and billiard balls. The basis for her theory is that each floor stops completely when it falls on top of another, so there is no acceleration. However, the buildings were only designed to support the static weight of the floors above them, not the dynamic force. In the case of the Twin Towers, each floor obviously created some drag, as evidenced by the debris next to the tower (which sometimes shot out the windows due to overpressure from the falling floors; these weren't "demolition squibs") that was falling faster than the monolithic mass. The floors continued to forcefully slam onto each other and the collapse became faster due to gravity.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Originally posted by RedBird
All you're seeing is dust rising off of the structure as it falls. The metal just goes straight down, the dust lingers and then disperses.
This should be pretty obvious.
How can 20 stories of upright steel beams fall straight down?
Down into what exactly?
According to the OS, there were no planes or fires in the basements.
So, how do 80 stories worth of debris fall into the basements and yet there is room for a 240 foot tall section of steel to fall straight down and disappear?
Into what hole?
Appearances are one thing, reality is another.