It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Clinton says there's clearly a need for the tighter security. But she says the government should explore ways to "to limit the number of people who are going to be put through surveillance."
She says she understands "how offensive it must be" for some people to undergo the searches. She says there's a need to strike "the right balance" and to "get it better and less intrusive and more precise."
Would she submit to a pat-down? "Not if I could avoid it," Clinton says. "No. I mean, who would?"
Originally posted by Frogs
Now - the question is - what comes of this? Its a slap in the face to Big Sis, Obama and the rest of the administration who have been spouting the company line and will boost her popularity with the public.
It will make her seem more "in touch" with the public when the rest of the administration seems to be totally out of touch with the public.
So why? Could she be eying a run down the road?