It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Are you talking about the radar information that said the UFOs were flying underground? That's impossible, right?
Originally posted by Jocko Flocko
The Belgium Triangle case has some fairly good photos. But what makes it a credible case is that it's backed up with military radar information,
There is quite a collection here:
Originally posted by wisintel
I would love to start a photo collection thread of the most credible clear UFO photos you have ever come across.
Originally posted by Argyll
What's the story with that one Zorgon?
Even the pro-UFO organization SOBEPs eventually agreed that the first 8 radar lockons were caused by EM interference, but after admitting they agreed those 8 were bad, they still wanted to hang on to #9 as "interesting", is that the one you're talking about? If so, I'll give you that, however it seems like quite a stretch to hang on to #9 as interesting instead of realizing that if there were problems with radar lockons 1-8, that the confidence in what #9 tells us shouldn't be real high.
Originally posted by FireMoon
The analysis of the Radar data is wholly and completely flawed.
Yes, there were sightings not backed up by radar data, but what I was disputing specifically was the claim that radar data back up sightings in any way...they don't. The pilots never even saw the radar objects (apparently because they weren't there, as SOBEPs agreed they were mostly the result of EM interference). Why would SOBEPs agree with the analysis if it's so flawed?
As for faking the photo, well of course you can fake any photo, so what? The attempt at copying the photo was done years afterwards when computer graphics had moved on a considerable amount and as Haynes points out, you can't do it down to the grain level and remain consistent. There were some quite lengthy sightings of the triangle where no radar return was seen at all.
Originally posted by nite owl
check these ufos out and an obduction in process to. www.youtube.com... Also, www.youtube.com... and don't forget the captured grey. www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
reply to post by zorgon
Wasn't that proven to be a piece of heat shield or something Zorgon?
Originally posted by Project-Sign
I think this is quite good.
Easily fakeable however, and probably is, but it's a good one.
Originally posted by zorgon
Well I guess that isn't really a UFO
Originally posted by Blue Shift
Originally posted by subby
The one in my avatar - Nashville, 1986 or 89, can't remember.
Impressive, but that was proven a long time ago to be a disco light set-up.