It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That sounded too good to be true.
Originally posted by C0bzz
Qantas has decided to check each engine for flaws, a process that takes 8 hours each aircraft, then if no problems are found they will likely be flying again.
the airline, Airbus and Rolls-Royce were working "working around the clock" to find the right fix for the issue.
Singapore Airlines, which was the launch airline for the A380 and operates 11 of the aircraft, initially said it would delay A380 departures, but soon cleared them.
"We have completed the engine inspections on all our A380 aircraft and did not find anything of concern," SIA spokesman Nicholas Ionides said on Monday.
Lufthansa changed a single engine on the airframe registered D-AIMA, the first A380 delivered to the airline. The jet is just six months old having arrived in mid-May.
A spokesman for the carrier points out that the decision is "precautionary", adding that the airline has discovered "no findings" relating to the Qantas mishap.
Chief Executive Alan Joyce said on Monday that its engines had a "slightly higher level of power" than those used in Singapore Airlines or Lufthansa planes, but they were certified to operate at those levels.
Rolls confirmed the problem related just to its Trent 900 engine type, and was down to the failure of a "specific component" which led to an oil fire.
Thanks for the update, have you got a link to more info about the fix?
Originally posted by thebozeian
As a side note I have noticed that the number of affected engines has steadily risen over the last few days and last night a figure of 80 affected powerplants was being mentioned which is basically all those in service. At least they now know what the issue is and have a fix designed.
Originally posted by thebozeian
There have been pictures that are now circulating on the web which show a hole in the spar big enough for a man to crawl through!
Originally posted by thebozeian
As well as one photo that showed part of the fuel gallery completely severed.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Indeed. We've had some interesting speculation regarding what would have happened if the disc had wiped out a spar cap, rather than the web.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
As I understand it, a forward pipe was completely severed - its purpose I cannot confirm at this time. However, this should not have affected the dump gallery, which is located at the trailing edge of the wing.
Air safety investigators in Australia say they have identified a serious manufacturing fault with some engines fitted to Airbus A380 passenger jets. A misaligned component of the Rolls-Royce Trent 900 engine used on a Qantas A380 which exploded last month thinned the wall of an oil pipe. This caused "fatigue cracking", which prompted leakage and ultimately a fire. Rolls-Royce said the Australian findings were "consistent with what we have said before".
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by Bordon81
If something is causing premature wear of the seals, then replacing the seals might be a band-aid to get the planes back in the air short term, but its not a long term solution. Longer term, they would have to find out what's causing premature wear, like an imbalance perhaps, or whatever else is making the seals fail before they are expected to fail, and fix the root cause of the premature wear.
Yes That makes sense if the issue causing seal failure has been identified and correctly fixed, has it? You seem to be suggesting a complete redesign might fix it?
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Fixing the seals is not a band aid and will prevent the issue repeating so long as the issue causing seal failure is correctly fixed.
Very true, I never tried to re-use any seals in this scenario, I always replaced them.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Also if you've ever done car maintenance removiving a tightly wedged part from somewhere if there is a seal or interface with another part, the seal or interface is going to suffer physical damage.
Thanks for the clarification, that part makes sense even in light of the emergence of the stress fracture failure.
It has emerged in the past 24 hours that the part was most likely a small segment of pipe with a flange around it's circumference half of which has broken off, with the remainder of the flange thinned by wear.
What I am saying is that if the engine was not modular in design then this part would be more permanent and the risks would not exist.