It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
7 Warning Signs of Bogus History
1. The author pitches the claim directly to the media or to organizations of non-historians, for pay.
2. The author says that a powerful establishment is trying to suppress his or her work.
5. The author says a belief is credible because it has endured for some time, or because many people believe it to be true.
The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus History 1. The author pitches the claim directly to the media or to organizations of non-historians, for pay.
2. The author says that a powerful establishment is trying to suppress his or her work.
3. The sources that verify the new interpretation of history are obscure; if they involve a famous person, the sources are not those usually relied on by historians.
4. Evidence for the history is anecdotal.
5. The author says a belief is credible because it has endured for some time, or because many people believe it to be true.
6. The author has worked in isolation.
7. The author must propose a new interpretation of history to explain an observation; heroes become villains, or great conspiracies are often invoked.
Originally posted by NoHierarchy
The author says that a powerful establishment is trying to suppress his or her work.
]
Originally posted by wiredamerican
7 warning signs of bogus history.
Ahh, you have just in detail explained the workings of wikileaks.
Wikilieaks is attempting to change our history. Is anyone paying attention?
We shall see.
What do you have in form of evidence to make such a baseless claim.
Originally posted by wiredamerican
reply to post by born2BWild
What do you have in form of evidence to make such a baseless claim.
Intelligence. !!
Originally posted by wiredamerican
Wikilieaks is attempting to change our history. Is anyone paying attention?
We shall see.