posted on Oct, 24 2010 @ 12:03 AM
One thing that i thought might worth chewing the cud over is the following...
How much does the eclipse of Sun by our Moon have, in the rise of knowledge on Earth? By that i mean we have this incredible cosmic coincidence where,
our moon happens to be 400 times smaller than the sun and in exactly the right position, in relation to Earth to provide perfect Eclipses. Not only
that, but we have managed to learn so much about our own star because of it's exact "fit". Solar prominences etc. I wonder how much of a catalyst
for mathematics and later optics, this coincidence has been? Given it has been visible to every civilisation since the dawn of man it has provided an
external focus for knowledge that is, in human terms, infinite in its' longevity.
Not only that, it as a celestial phenomenon, provides a focus for human endeavour that looks towards the skies and outer space itself. . It has been
a stimulus that has prodded us along a path that has led, indirectly to our modern technological world.
Given that it makes an interesting thought as to, how other intelligences might respond to their natural environmental conditions. Imagine, if you
will, another world where intelligent life has developed. This world however, is a world of mostly mountainous areas and oceans. There is very little
usable flat land and the most fertile areas are all in those areas that are mountainous. .Because of this, the wheel as a technology has very little
scope for development, in purely practical terms. In actual fact this intelligence developed balloons for transport at the same time they invented
the water wheel. In fact, by a time say comparable to our medieval period socially, magnetic levitation had been discovered and developed as a
practical technology along with the commensurate understanding and use of electricity. Now, the adoption and understanding of electricity/magnetism
has been the true difference between us as modern humans, and our ancestors?
It could be wholly possible for a society, socially whose development is in the same stage of as the Romans were 2000 years ago. to have flying
machines and that, they could well be traversing space before say, slavery, has been outlawed. In other words, we tend to imbue any possible star
travelers with a highly developed and cohesive social structure., many years in advance of ours. Maybe the truth is that, local conditions dictate the
rise of technology even more than social cohesion and planning?
Just as our moon, eclipsing the Sun, has pushed us, maybe far quicker than we might have moved otherwise, local conditions elsewhere may make other
modes of transport an imperative rather than a pipe dream. When all said and done, the wheel is actually a technological cul-de-sac that has a finite
performance envelop that we have spent countless money and effort on. Effort and money that, in the end, will one day, most likely viewed as a quaint
anachronism of our age. It wouldn't surprise me to find that, future generations refer to the history up till now and for the foreseeable future, as
the "Wheel-Age" as we refer to the Stone -Age and Bronze-Age etc. I can just imagine some future school kids laughing at the idea and equally
horrified by it that, we almost denuded this world of resources in the, almost pathological pursuance, of the wheel. "You mean they really use to
drag resources from out of the ground and from all over the world to make these totally inefficient machines they called cars? "
It is a rather sobering thought that we might bump into a society that is 300 years ahead of us in terms of technology, yet maybe a millennium behind
us in terms of social awareness?
That said, on a world where their equivalent of Vercingetrix beat Julius Caesar and their Celts overtook their Romans as the dominant force for
modelling social structures, they could be, 100s of years ahead of us socially, but behind us technologically.
Intelligence/Technology/Social Awareness, is probably a whole lot more complex an equation than we tend to assume it might be?