It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The word "PROOF" will no longer be tolerated.

page: 2
9
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 10 2010 @ 08:57 PM
link   
sorry to say this but

there isnt proof to anything in life

we cant prove we exist

everything may be false

so, we only have truths if they are related to some theory

so, I am sorry, but you will never find a real proof




posted on Sep, 10 2010 @ 09:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Faiol


so, I am sorry, but you will never find a real proof



Oh, yeah, I bet you can't proove that.



posted on Sep, 10 2010 @ 09:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by FortAnthem
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman
 



I have PROOF that GeechQuestInfo claimed the rights to the coinage a year and a half ago!



That's no proof, it's evidence.

Until you can PROOVE that nobody on this God's green Earth used that phrase before GeechQuestInfo it hasn't been proven that he coined the phrase first.


Turnabout is fair play.


Ah, but I only said that he claimed the rights last year...


See how that works?



edit on 10/9/2010 by Iamonlyhuman because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 10 2010 @ 10:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman
 


Yes you never claimed PROOF, but you did Prove the OPs proof was not proof...As in proofer...


But then you need a "reputable" source"...You used ATS..



edit on 10-9-2010 by CynicalM because: last line



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 12:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by airspoon
Hey now, I have used the word "proof" in a thread title before and it wasn't a hoax. To me, the information and video presented in the thread is proof.
But it's not. It's proof that as many as 4 guys had as many as 6 guns, because that's all that's shown. It doesn't prove how they got them; it doesn't prove that the rest of Al Qaeda was similarly equipped. So yes, your title was misleading.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 12:23 AM
link   
reply to post by JoshNorton
 


No, because the video wasn't the entire presentation, as I also give personal accounts and experiences, as well as rebuttals for initial thoughts. Initial thoughts such as, "they picked those weapons off of dead soldiers" that the less experienced members seem to draw on. Furthermore, it has been proven to me, at least beyond a shadow of doubt (as much as something could be proven) that insurgents are being supplied either by or with US resources. Regardless, those "insurgents" have US resources, thus the US supplied them, whether intentionally or not and the video alone proves that.

--airspoon


edit on 11-9-2010 by airspoon because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 02:00 AM
link   
Proof>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence

Good thread mate, we need more of this style of thinking.




top topics



 
9
<< 1   >>

log in

join