reply to post by LarryLove
Sorry m8 you pointed to Islam,GOD,9/11
I replied on each issue you mentioned and yes i remember clearly the thread in which the term infected was used...and it was used as a term as in a
question rather than being a statement...and it was more than a few weeks ago.
there was a great many replies to the thread and i believe it was quite well represented from both sides of the table.
That thread alone was an open discussion upon the very issue which did have very many interesting replies and was of great benefit.
did it lead to a rash amount of banning i would sure hope not....as if you want to change people minds you dont ban them you try to show them the way
through open discussion.
once again i will re-itterate....It is known as open debate....several viewpoints that come together which can sometime(rarely) led to a sensible
conclusion.
so the IMO if i dont agree with someones opinion...i can retaliate,or i can decide if the person is worth having a discussion with, if i choose the
second option then i just dont post in that thread anymore.Then sometimes the thread will just die a graceful death.
Is there sometime a disruptive few...yes there can be....but like i say it is my choice wether to personally engage or to neutrally slide a point in
the thread from time to time.Some people act like in real life...they raise their voice to get their point across...and it shows up in the way people
post....so please use your own intelligence to figure things out and lifee will honestly improve.
or just moan moan moan,,,,,,that might work....the squeaky wheel gets the grease,,,,and from what i am reading in the responses your definately
getting the grease......
i gave a star to the previous poster as i have to agree with LIB