It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
I tend to agree, from personal experiences of the past year and a half or so. In my process of trying to make sense of these things, I've read from, among other things, both Buddhist texts and the Bible (mostly the Gospels), and with each would very frequently find myself saying "yeah, that clicks."
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
What's most remarkable is how much more the words in the Gospels mean to me now than they did during my Christian upbringing, and yet I'm pretty sure I don't consider myself a Christian these days.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
Hence my somewhat dodgy attempt at reconciling the two dogmas.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
I think what happens is you experience something that is just straight-up ineffable, cannot be described in words, and yet to you it is real and clear as day, understood on "another level" so to speak. So you feel like there must be a way to put it into words, if only you could find the right ones.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
And yet as history shows time and time again, the content of the experience itself cannot be properly communicated in words.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
If you are eloquent and convincing enough, the best you can do is have others erect a structure of dogma around your experience and turn it into a religion. Could religions be just the failures of those who have seen and attempted to communicate in mere words?
Originally posted by EasternShadow
There are 4 millions people at 10,000 BC. There are 6 Billion people at 1999 AD. My information is based from :
www.worldhistorysite.com...
Assuming the stats is correct, my question is, if soul is the process of recycling, where do this over 5 Billions souls come from?
1
The tao that can be told
is not the eternal Tao
The name that can be named
is not the eternal Name.
The unnamable is the eternally real.
Naming is the origin
of all particular things.
But I do not think it a good thing for men that there should be a disquisition, as it is called, on this topic-except for some few, who are able with a little teaching to find it out for themselves. As for the rest, it would fill some of them quite illogically with a mistaken feeling of contempt, and others with lofty and vain-glorious expectations, as though they had learnt something high and mighty.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Life is meant to exist at a personal level of each individual, it's what makes the universe and all things on earth beautiful, without it there is just a big nothing, this is the point, to evolve from nothing into something with separation, not the other way around.
Originally posted by pepsi78
You can't really expiriance once you are all because everything is the same.
Originally posted by pepsi78
The big fish eats the small fish, the small fish does not become the big fish but the big fish becomes bigger and the small fish does not exist anymore.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Your feeding the monsters energy until nothing becomes of you and that is unity with the absolute.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
The teachings of Jesus make very good sense after the experience, for the most part. There are still areas where I am like "huh?"
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
But after long consideration and much varied reading and my own experience, I came to realize that the culture, assumptions, and intellect of the "mystic" do influence their take on the experience. The mystic experience does not make you an infallible thing or consciousness. The regular (egoic) mind is still there, still in place, with all its flaws, only now you have another "awareness" with which to check it. Compare it against. Contrast it to.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
I dont know how long it has been for you, but this October makes ten years for me, and I have done much of what you are doing.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
The part I have found most interesting and frustrating is that not only can you not speak properly about it, but you really cant THINK properly about it either.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Im really glad to have this discussion with you.
If all you know is the individual, it is perfectly understandable that you would find the idea of not being individual upsetting. If your whole life, all you had ever eaten was spinach, the idea of eating something else might be frightening too. But once you ate the other thing, you might discover it was a pretty darn good, and wonder why you had wasted your whole life eating only spinach.
The egoic fear. "If I become that and release my individuality I will no longer exist."
The ego doesnt exist in the first place. We experience it, but "it" has no existence. It is just a shadow created by lack of awareness of our true nature.
Something that is "lack of" doesnt have real existence. And perhaps because of this, it is full of fear, and worry, desire to hold on, insistence on importance of 'self" etc. You could lose your identity before you even lose your life if you get amnesia or brain injury. Its that tenuous. You can want to hold onto it all you like, but there is nothing to hold onto. You cant grasp a shadow. No matter how real it looks.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
One of the things I found striking in my recent readings of the Bible is realizing that when Jesus would give a talk and follow it with "he who hath ears to hear, let him hear", he was referring to those for whom his teachings "clicked".
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
Precisely! Ever since I started to "wake up", I've been continuing to have epiphanies, as well as painful internal struggles, and to me that just goes to show that just because you've seen into things a little more deeply doesn't mean you have all the answers. I like to say that awakening is a journey, not a destination.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
I can't really pinpoint an exact moment because with me it started out with purely intellectual epiphanies, while the spiritual stuff came later and started out in small doses before it became unmistakeable.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
I had a lot of prejudices I needed to give up first, and every one is like pulling a tooth. Liberating when it's done, but not fun when it's happening.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
when a couple events brought me face to face with the fact that I was not the good and just and honest and intellectual person I had long prided myself in being. In fact I was nothing like it and probably the opposite.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
The real weirdness didn't start happening until the end of 2009. But that's where it gets ineffable. I'd attempt to describe it but this post is getting long as it is.
So mine is quite a bit more recent than yours. I'm a young'un at this.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
But the progression of my experience is why I hold the belief that if you want to see the spiritual, you first have to bust apart a good chunk of the neurotic baggage if you have it. That stuff will stop you in your tracks.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
There's more to this world than meets the eye.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
I haven't read any Plato except maybe a fourth of the Republic a long time ago. The stuff you mentioned sounds very worth a read.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
I havent really read Jung, but you are not the first person who has mentioned him in such a way as to make me feel like I should. Feel free to suggest a title for me.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
I personally think it all springs from the (voice) strings of God.
That's still a far cry from the whole "reality is nothing but ignorance" that you hear a lot from Buddhists...
I am quite convinced that Siddhartha became acquainted with some very interesting truths. But what you hear from his followers these days strikes of nonsense, often not without some irony when they start talking about "ignorance".
[edit on 12-8-2010 by NewlyAwakened]
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
I wonder how many physicists or biologists are also hardcore Buddhists. I would guess not many.