It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A team of the British, American, and Hungarian astronomers have reported the universe is crossed by at least 13 'Great Walls', apparent rivers of galaxies 100Mpc long in the surveyed domain of 7 billion light years. They found galaxies clustered into bands spaced about 600 millon light years apart. The pattern of these clusters stretches across about one-fourth of the diameter of the universe, or about seven billion light years. This huge shell and void pattern would have required nearly 150 billion years to form, based on their speed of movement, if produced by the standard Big Bang cosmology (Lerner 1990).
Discovery of the Great Walls of galaxies and filamentary clumping of galactic mater has greatly upset the traditional notion that galactic matter should be uniformly distributed. If the universe began with a Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago, the awesome size of these large-scale structures is baffling because there is apparently not sufficient time available for such massive objects to form and to become organized.
Originally posted by Droogie
...This huge shell and void pattern would have required nearly 150 billion years to form, based on their speed of movement...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by fixer1967
"Careful what you wish for, young Padawan"
You'll have Tom Cruise and John Travolta beating a path to your door!
"$cientologists" claim that the Universe is something like 13 trillion years old (or some other nonsense)....this might give them wet dreams of 'crediblity', if they try to spin it.....
Originally posted by abecedarian
Makes one wonder... if gravity can bend light, i.e. gravitational lensing, is it too much to assume, or rather 'abstract' from this, that gravity affects the speed of light? Shouldn't an object possessing mass pull light towards it and likewise slow light leaving it?
Interesting. I thought that photons have a wave / mass duality thus are affected by gravity. Theory says that the gravity of a black hole is sufficiently strong to prevent light of any energy level from escaping.
Originally posted by Karilla
Originally posted by abecedarian
Makes one wonder... if gravity can bend light, i.e. gravitational lensing, is it too much to assume, or rather 'abstract' from this, that gravity affects the speed of light? Shouldn't an object possessing mass pull light towards it and likewise slow light leaving it?
Photons have no mass, so no, gravity can't affect their speed in the way you're describing. The explanation for gravitational lensing is that large bodies distort space-time around them an this will affect a photon's trajectory. In the case of black holes the distortion is so great that it folds back on itself, as I understand it, meaning that no light can escape. Other interactions can slow the speed of light, but most it just has its phase shifted by these interactions.
Deputy Adviser, Ministry of Statistics & Progrmme Implementation New Delhi, India
This theory has been proposed as the "tired light" model or similar theories and while some of that might occur to a small extent, studies like these have shown the tired light models are probably not correct:
Originally posted by abecedarian
Who's to say that any particular quanta, or group of photons, that reaches our planet is the same quanta that a star emitted?
This time dilation is a consequence of the standard interpretation of the redshift: a supernova that takes 20 days to decay will appear to take 40 days to decay when observed at redshift z=1. The time dilation has been observed, with 5 different published measurements of this effect in supernova light curves. These papers are:
* Leibundgut etal, 1996, ApJL, 466, L21-L24
* Goldhaber etal, in Thermonuclear Supernovae (NATO ASI), eds. R. Canal, P. Ruiz-LaPuente, and J. Isern.
* Riess etal, 1997, AJ, 114, 722.
* Perlmutter etal, 1998, Nature, 391, 51.
* Goldhaber etal, ApJ in press.
These observations contradict tired light models of the redshift.
Originally posted by Karilla
Originally posted by abecedarian
Makes one wonder... if gravity can bend light, i.e. gravitational lensing, is it too much to assume, or rather 'abstract' from this, that gravity affects the speed of light? Shouldn't an object possessing mass pull light towards it and likewise slow light leaving it?
Photons have no mass, so no, gravity can't affect their speed in the way you're describing. The explanation for gravitational lensing is that large bodies distort space-time around them an this will affect a photon's trajectory. In the case of black holes the distortion is so great that it folds back on itself, as I understand it, meaning that no light can escape. Other interactions can slow the speed of light, but most it just has its phase shifted by these interactions.
Originally posted by SlasherOfVeils
Originally posted by Karilla
*******The explanation for gravitational lensing is that large bodies distort space-time around them an this will affect a photon's trajectory.*****
actually, photons are effected by gravity, as seen in gravitational lenses, when gravity bends light around supermassive objects (black holes, supermassive stars or galaxies, etc) which can actually bend the light of objects hidden behind them, magnifying them or distorting it.
imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov...
en.wikipedia.org...
According to the photon theory of light, photons . . .
* move at a constant velocity, c = 2.9979 x 108 m/s (i.e. "the speed of light"), in free space
* have zero mass and rest energy.
* carry energy and momentum, which are also related to the frequency nu and wavelength lamdba of the electromagnetic wave by E = h nu and p = h / lambda.
* can be destroyed/created when radiation is absorbed/emitted.
* can have particle-like interactions (i.e. collisions) with electrons and other particles, such as in the Compton effect.
Source
This backs up my explanation of gravitational lensing and black holes in the post above, but explains it better than I managed:
Enter Albert Einstein. In 1915 he proposed the theory of general relativity. General relativity explained, in a consistent way, how gravity affects light. We now knew that while photons have no mass, they do possess momentum (so your statement about light not affecting matter is incorrect). We also knew that photons are affected by gravitational fields not because photons have mass, but because gravitational fields (in particular, strong gravitational fields) change the shape of space-time. The photons are responding to the curvature in space-time, not directly to the gravitational field. Space-time is the four-dimensional "space" we live in -- there are 3 spatial dimensions (think of X,Y, and Z) and one time dimension.
As a star contracts, the gravitational field at its surface gets stronger, thus bending the light more. This makes it more and more difficult for light from the star to escape, thus it appears to us that the star is dimmer. Eventually, if the star shrinks to a certain critical radius, the gravitational field at the surface becomes so strong that the path of the light is bent so severely inward so that it returns to the star itself. The light can no longer escape.
imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov...
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
I'm not a cosmologist but my initial question is:
Could these galaxies be remnants of the Universe before ours?