It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XyZeR
SO It's now proven that 50% of Americans have no clue what socialism actually is... I was right after all!
I blame the years of trying to demonise communism during the Cold war,
American's view of what socialism, Marxism and communism is have been
lumped together and distorted trough years of western anti communism propaganda.
Dangerously ignorant if you ask me...
The first clear indication that Obama is not, in fact, a socialist, is the way his administration is avoiding structural changes to the financial system. Nationalization is simply not in the playbook of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and his team. They favor costly, temporary measures that can easily be dismantled should the economy stabilize. Socialists support nationalization and see it as a means of creating a banking system that acts like a highly regulated public utility. The banks would then cease to be sinkholes for public funds or financial versions of casinos and would become essential to reenergizing productive sectors of the economy.
The same holds true for health care. A national health insurance system as embodied in the single-payer health plan reintroduced in legislation this year by Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), makes perfect sense to us. That bill would provide comprehensive coverage, offer a full range of choice of doctors and services and eliminate the primary cause of personal bankruptcy -- health-care bills. Obama's plan would do the opposite. By mandating that every person be insured, ObamaCare would give private health insurance companies license to systematically underinsure policyholders while cashing in on the moral currency of universal coverage. If Obama is a socialist, then on health care, he's doing a fairly good job of concealing it.
Issues of war and peace further weaken the commander in chief's socialist credentials. Obama announced that all U.S. combat brigades will be removed from Iraq by August 2010, but he still intends to leave as many as 50,000 troops in Iraq and wishes to expand the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan. A socialist foreign policy would call for the immediate removal of all troops. It would seek to follow the proposal made recently by an Afghan parliamentarian, which called for the United States to send 30,000 scholars or engineers instead of more fighting forces.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to post by XyZeR
I don't know why I see so many posts like yours
"americans don't know what socialism is" but then you don't explain it yourself.
economic fascism is a better word than socialist.
Originally posted by XyZeR
In stead of asking me what it really means, you could have done some research and find out yourself.
Originally posted by ThaLoccster
I think they don't say he's a corporatist or any other definition you could easily brand him with, because then the American people would start to see the similarities between all the other Presidents, you have to individually brand them.
Clinton the cheater, Bush the idiot, Obama the Socialist. If you take those labels away and apply more fitting labels, they all might be wearing the same shirt then, and the people would start to realize that we've been #ed for a long time.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
words
Obama is a communist and most of the losers he associates with are anarchists, communists, racists, and other low forms of life. So, they are sort of coming around to the reality of our commie dirtbag president.
The man is a fascist corporatist puppet.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to post by XyZeR
I see many posts like yours and your inability or interest to define it after such a statement makes me think it's you and other authors of posts like yours that do not know what socialism is.
Like the video says, there are better words than socialism but it isn't that wrong either.