posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 12:58 AM
Global Elite Picked Obama Long Before Voters
Disclaimer: Low evidence news story, but some indications it could be true which I will explain along with my reasons and thoughts, interesting if
nothing else, research it like I did.
This article says that Obama was groomed to become president before the 1990s. The information comes from Tom Fife.
Who Is Tom Fife?
Tom Fife was a government contractor with an active security clearance, who took notes on his trips for Defense Intelligence Agency
debriefings within the Department of Defense. In 1992, following an astounding conversation at a dinner party in Moscow, he took down notes for future
reference. It was long before the world ever heard the name “Barack Obama.”
Students of revisionist history will remember that Bill Clinton disappeared from Oxford University in England for a while in 1970 and
surfaced in Moscow purportedly to be trained in communism.
He says that he was in Moscow off and on in the early 90s working on a 'software development, joint venture with people from the russian scientific
community. He states he worked with a scientist whos wife was still a huge communist supporter.
This is how the conversation started (after discussing why America has not yet had a woman president):
“Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get ablack president very soon,” she said. The concensus we expressed was that we didn’t
think there was anything innately barring that. The right person at the right time and sure, America would try to vote for the right person, be he or
she, black or not.
“What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon, and he will be a communist?” she said. “Well, you will, and he
will be a communist.”
One of us asked, “It sounds like you know something we don’t know.”
“Yes, it is true,” she replied. “This is not some idle talk. He is already born, and he is educated and being groomed to be
president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of presidents. He is what you call ‘Ivy League.’ You
don’t believe me, but he is real, and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and his father is black from Africa. That’s
right, a mixed baby! And he’s going to be president.”
Now, anyone could say this if they wanted to, all of this is old hat to us now. The conversation continues with details about young Barack, after
which she stated that he would be a blessing for world communism and that he would pave the way for communism to take root in America.
She said something to the effect that America was at the same time the great hope and the great obstacle for communism. America would have to be
CONVERTED to communism, and Barack was going to pave the way.
While I'm leary of this story for obvious reasons, this part I agree with 100%. If you want to end freedom and take over the world then America is
your first physical battleground. Also there are documents that say that communists were already infiltrating America in the early 1900s. Although the
most interesting story I've read is an interrogation of a bolshevik revolutionary by Stalin's secret police (later called the red symphony if
you're interested). Where the man they are interrogating says he is a part of the "communist-capitalist collective" that wields enormous power. He
said he was part of Lenin's group and that plans were already under way to subvert America (and later the rest of the world). Stalin was not supposed
to take over and threw a wrench in their plans. They wanted a global revolution within a few decades. When they asked more about his "group", they
began asking if it was masonry. He said basically yes and no. Meaning that while many in the com.-cap. collective were masons, not all masons were in,
and degrees had nothing to do with being in their 'group'. He then told them that many others higher up (in Stalin's new regime) were in it, and
when the interrogators asked higher ups they told them to let him go. They saw him on T.V. in America at a few important events not too long after he
was released. There have been many indications that the so called NWO is actually about global communist government, although it is more about tyranny
vs. freedom than communism vs. any other system. America has become a strange mixture of fascism and socialism. Former nazi's helped start the CIA
and NASA and led the way in research for a while. Corporations that supported fascism and did business with hitler are still some of the most powerful
in the world. The military-industrial-congressional complex is fascist as far as merging state and corporate power. Communism eliminates anything
except government power. Defense contractors and corporate military are decidedly fascist. Socialism is evident in welfare and now with "obamacare"
(although not actually happening yet). Both systems manipulate people and create 1984-like societies (look around, its evident this has been on an
upward trend for living memory). Capitalism is also guilty of many injustices, but at least here we strived for freedom unlike most places on earth.
These two systems have been taking over our policies for almost a century. In my opinion, they are the highest level at which an ideological divide
exists. Different forces competing for domination at lower levels. I have a theory on where this is going-unveiling of the highest teaching of the
occult: luciferian philosophy,check my other threads if you're interested.
So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove?
… It doesn’t prove that Obama has had Soviet communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but
it DOES SHOW one thing that I think is important. It shows that Soviet Russian communists KNEW of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that
they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed communist to pave the way for their future. This report on Barack came to me
personally from one of THEM (communist) long before America knew he existed.
It doesn't prove anything obviously, but I found it interesting and vaguely plausible based on past evidence, now discuss.
[edit on 8-7-2010 by time91]