posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 04:14 PM
It is really simple. Take a group of about twenty people: Can they come into agreement in fundamental questions? No. Can they come into agreement even
in minuscule issues? Probably no. So how can anyone be expected to rule the world when even two individuals cannot really agree upon anything that has
As above so below. Mankind will not unite before it happens naturally. It cannot be forced. Of course there are -- and will be -- attempts to do so.
There are those who would like to rule the world, but it hasn't happened in past, and it will not happen in future in forced manner.
Of course, in order to make real progress mankind has to become together in a co-operative manner.
But there is the doctrine of 'divide and conquer' which can be rephrased as 'divide and rule'. NWO's agenda may be -- when conveyed in this way
-- to rule through disagreement and diversity. It may be easy to rule people who cannot really unite into movement of sufficient momentum.
But in this method lurks a grave danger to those whom wish to maintain in power. Ultimately they will not be able to maintain control as it requires
sufficient co-operation between the people who run the system. Their personal agendas and opinions with the lust of total power will eventually
get in the way. They will succumb into mutual competition and eventually their game will fail. There will be revolts, economical recessions,
"witch/vampire hunts", wars and so on.
So long-lasting NWO with modern state of human psychology is failure. Today there are those who attempt this -- yet tomorrow there will be others on
their place. Mankind will not experience "paradise", but various levels of "inferno", as they carry it inside.
[edit on 29-6-2010 by v01i0]