It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
JERUSALEM
Israel will significantly ease its bruising blockade of the Gaza Strip
on Wednesday, officials said, in an effort to blunt the widespread
international criticism that has followed a deadly Israeli commando
raid on a blockade-busting flotilla.
Senior Cabinet ministers were meeting to limit restrictions to a short
list of goods, such as cement and steel, which Israel says militants
could use in their battle against the Jewish state.
But even those goods would be allowed in to an undetermined extent
in coordination with the United Nations, the officials said. They spoke
on condition of anonymity because the decision has not been officially
announced.
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
Perhaps this is a step further towards a peaceful solution in that region. It's a shame some members will always try to demionise their enemies, even when they try to do the right thing. It doesn't matter whether this is just for PR, as long as it is put into effect and the Palestinian people as a whole benefit from it, it should be welcomed.
Originally posted by virgom129
reply to post by Dark Ghost
Yes and some members just call each atrocity as they see it...
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
Perhaps this is a step further towards a peaceful solution in that region. It's a shame some members will always try to demionise their enemies, even when they try to do the right thing. It doesn't matter whether this is just for PR, as long as it is put into effect and the Palestinian people as a whole benefit from it, it should be welcomed.
Originally posted by LittleSecret
If you are doing wrong, and then slowly stop doing wrong and still doing wrong doesn't make it right.
The blockade was inhumane, to ease it is on the right direction, but can't be called right until the stop the wrong.
This is the confusion in language, that is why they treat Palestinians in an aggressive and dehumanizing manner, so that next time they simply right the wrong and still getting good public image because they seem like they are doing good.
Originally posted by virgom129
Your post should be deleted...
Just where did I say anything about hating Israel or wanting it obliterated???
You are a troublemaker.....
Originally posted by LittleSecret
positive reinforcement?
Palestinians have been living under apartheid rule for probably 60 years now.
Sometimes you say enough is enough and use other means than positive reinforcement, or negotiations, or talk, talk, talk when knowing the two sides are not equal, and when knowing Israel has nothing to gain from peace.
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
You need to look up the definition of "Apartheid".
a social policy or racial segregation involving political and economic and legal discrimination against people who are not Whites
In addition, it is an outright lie to suggest that the current treatment of Palestinians has been going on longer than since the 2nd Intifada. Israel and Palestinians enjoyed relative peace in the years before the second uprising took place.
Less talk and more discussion. I don't think violence from either side has achieved much, do you? I didn't say things were equal, just that there were two sides to the conflict. On ATS we mostly get to hear about one side.
If you want to argue along those lines, then please tell me what Palestinians have to gain from peace with Israel? What is your idea of peace for the Palestinians, and how does Israel relate to that?
stirred an outburst of anger amongst Palestinians, exasperated by the stagnation of the peace process, as well as by the continuing occupation and settlement expansion.
The violent repression of Palestinian demonstrations demanding the immediate ending of the occupation killed more than 200 Palestinians in one month, of which one third was under 17 years old. To respond to this brutality, the Intifada became militarised as from the beginning of November 2000.
Among the many reasons for the start of the second Palestinian intifada in September 2000, the massive expansion of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and Gaza must count as the most important.
The 1993 Oslo Accords signed by the PLO and Israel were meant to reconcile Palestinian aspirations for self-determination and statehood and the existence of Israel. In fact, an aggressive policy of settlement expansion and consolidation took place over the following seven years. More Arab land was taken over and more Palestinian homes were bulldozed, more exclusively Jewish roa
When Yasser Arafat and Yitzak Rabin shook hands on the White House lawn in September 1993 there were about 115,000 Jewish settlers in West Bank and Gaza. By the time of the second intifada seven years later there were more than 200,000 of them. Reports suggest another 1,500 families (17,000 people) have been added to this total during 2001, more than the 400 settler families that have moved back to Israel under the impact of the intifada.
Gaza, one of the most densely populated tracts of land in the world, is home to 1,178,000 Palestinians, 33 per cent of whom live in United Nations-funded refugee camps.
Gaza is also home to 6,900 Jewish settlers. Yet the Israeli-controlled areas and settlements take up about 40 per cent of Gaza's land. Israel controls all external borders, crossing points and major roads in Gaza.
Originally posted by virgom129
Why doesn't Israel just abide by the agreement reached in 1967???
Personally I think Israel will just keep expanding.
Not sure why you would bring Australia into it..
The Aborigines get way more Goverment money per person that anyone else...They also have much more land than they can use.They actually lease it out to mining and tourist companies.
Are you saying the Israel Goverment does the same???