It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Physicists at Durham University now claim the calculations on which the Standard Model is based could be fatally flawed.
Originally posted by Maddogkull
Of course we do not have the answers; we would not have this article if we did. But this article just shows that that the dark energy model is not accurate.
British scientists have claimed that the method used to calculate the make-up of the universe may be wrong...
This raises the possibility that the “dark side” of the cosmos does not exist
"When we checked radio sources in the WMAP background, we found more smoothing than the WMAP team expected," Shanks told SPACE.com. "That would have big implications for cosmology if we were proven right."
If this smoothing error is larger than thought, it could indicate that fluctuations measured in the intensity of the CMB radiation are actually smaller than they originally appeared. The size of these fluctuations is a key parameter used to support the existence of dark matter and dark energy.
"These are weak sources, so many of them must be averaged together to obtain useful measurements. None of them move with respect to the CMB," said WMAP team member Mark Halpern of the University of British Columbia. "This method is inferior to our main approach."
The European Space Agency's Planck spacecraft, launched into orbit in 2009, is currently taking new, even more detailed observations of the CMB.
"I'm very interested to see what Planck gets in terms of its results," Shanks said. "And of course we will be there to try and keep everybody as honest as possible. We're hoping we can use our methods in the same way to check their beam profile that they ultimately come up with."
Originally posted by Maddogkull
reply to post by mnemeth1
Haven't they observed neutron stars before?
Originally posted by Maddogkull
reply to post by mnemeth1
But were is the evidence for the Aether then?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by Maddogkull
When 96 percent of the universe is missing, that's enough to inspire you to want to find answers to the mystery. Saying that the standard model may not be correct is kind of stating the obvious with 96% of the universe missing. So obviously we don't have the answers to that. But from reading the article, I'm not sure they have the answers either.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by sirnex
I suppose before we can say to science "Your math is wrong, Idiots", we need to see some evidence that the math is actually wrong.
The math could be wrong, but I would not be surprised to learn that there IS really "something" all around us (call it Dark Matter, or call it anything you want) in the Universe that exerts a gravitational force, but cannot be observed by us in any other traditional way.
The quantum-scale universe seems weird enough as it is -- would this "stuff" be that much weirder as to make it impossible to believe?